Implementing an International Standard for Manufacturing System Lifecycle Management Using Object-Process Methodology

Rea Lavi, D. Dori, Y. Dori
{"title":"Implementing an International Standard for Manufacturing System Lifecycle Management Using Object-Process Methodology","authors":"Rea Lavi, D. Dori, Y. Dori","doi":"10.1109/SWSTE.2016.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Object-Process Methodology (OPM) is a model-based systems engineering methodology which has been recognized as an ISO 19450:2015 standard for automation systems and integration. It is domain-independent and intended for conceptual modeling of systems of various kinds. We collaborated remotely with a team that had implemented this methodology for modeling their proposed international standard, which concerned manufacturing systems lifecycle management. The goal of this collaboration was to achieve a satisfactory level of text-model coherence and model quality for the proposed standard that comply with ISO 19450. Achieving this goal proved to be an ill-structured problem, without defined initial or final states and without a clear procedure for solving it. We compare three latter versions of the conceptual model using a quality assessment rubric that has been validated in previous studies. Utilizing OPM in this capacity enabled efficacious evaluation of model quality at every stage of authoring. The case described herein demonstrates how OPM can be utilized by interdisciplinary teams to tackle ill structured problems more effectively.","PeriodicalId":118525,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering (SWSTE)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Software Science, Technology and Engineering (SWSTE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SWSTE.2016.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Object-Process Methodology (OPM) is a model-based systems engineering methodology which has been recognized as an ISO 19450:2015 standard for automation systems and integration. It is domain-independent and intended for conceptual modeling of systems of various kinds. We collaborated remotely with a team that had implemented this methodology for modeling their proposed international standard, which concerned manufacturing systems lifecycle management. The goal of this collaboration was to achieve a satisfactory level of text-model coherence and model quality for the proposed standard that comply with ISO 19450. Achieving this goal proved to be an ill-structured problem, without defined initial or final states and without a clear procedure for solving it. We compare three latter versions of the conceptual model using a quality assessment rubric that has been validated in previous studies. Utilizing OPM in this capacity enabled efficacious evaluation of model quality at every stage of authoring. The case described herein demonstrates how OPM can be utilized by interdisciplinary teams to tackle ill structured problems more effectively.
使用对象过程方法实施制造系统生命周期管理的国际标准
对象过程方法(OPM)是一种基于模型的系统工程方法,已被认可为自动化系统和集成的ISO 19450:2015标准。它是领域独立的,用于各种系统的概念建模。我们与一个团队进行了远程合作,该团队已经实现了该方法,为他们提出的国际标准建模,该标准涉及制造系统生命周期管理。这次合作的目标是为符合ISO 19450的拟议标准实现令人满意的文本模型一致性和模型质量。实现这一目标被证明是一个结构不良的问题,没有明确的初始或最终状态,也没有明确的解决过程。我们比较了三个后版本的概念模型使用质量评估准则,已在以前的研究中得到验证。在这种能力中利用OPM可以在每个创作阶段对模型质量进行有效的评估。本文描述的案例展示了跨学科团队如何利用OPM来更有效地解决结构不良的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信