Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for detecting cancer in resected thyroid nodules at a referral hospital

Reem Alawadhi, Ahmad M. Matalkah, Naveed Ahmed, A. Alduaij, A. Sabri, S. El-Kaissi, Y. Akmal
{"title":"Accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for detecting cancer in resected thyroid nodules at a referral hospital","authors":"Reem Alawadhi, Ahmad M. Matalkah, Naveed Ahmed, A. Alduaij, A. Sabri, S. El-Kaissi, Y. Akmal","doi":"10.4103/jdep.jdep_5_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Thyroid nodules are a common presentation in clinical practice. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a useful method of triaging patients between benign, suspicious, and malignant categories. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of the electronic medical record of all surgical thyroid patients presenting to our institution between July 2015 and June 2017. The cytological and histological data were reviewed and correlated based on the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Results: Two hundred and seven patients underwent thyroidectomies during that period of which 164 had preoperative FNAC. The female-male ratio of 4.9:1. On histology, 52% of nodules were benign and 48% of nodules were malignant. When comparing with cytologic diagnosis, FNAC showed a sensitivity of 52%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 92%, negative predictive value of 64%, false positive rate 5%, and false negative rate 48%. Total accuracy was found to be 72%. Conclusion: FNAC is a useful tool in deciding management options for patients, but has limitations, particularly when evaluating follicular lesions. This leads to discrepancy in the calculation of statistical values in literature.","PeriodicalId":294186,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice","volume":"16 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes and Endocrine Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jdep.jdep_5_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Thyroid nodules are a common presentation in clinical practice. Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is a useful method of triaging patients between benign, suspicious, and malignant categories. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective review of the electronic medical record of all surgical thyroid patients presenting to our institution between July 2015 and June 2017. The cytological and histological data were reviewed and correlated based on the Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology. Results: Two hundred and seven patients underwent thyroidectomies during that period of which 164 had preoperative FNAC. The female-male ratio of 4.9:1. On histology, 52% of nodules were benign and 48% of nodules were malignant. When comparing with cytologic diagnosis, FNAC showed a sensitivity of 52%, specificity of 95%, positive predictive value of 92%, negative predictive value of 64%, false positive rate 5%, and false negative rate 48%. Total accuracy was found to be 72%. Conclusion: FNAC is a useful tool in deciding management options for patients, but has limitations, particularly when evaluating follicular lesions. This leads to discrepancy in the calculation of statistical values in literature.
转诊医院细针穿刺细胞学检测切除甲状腺结节癌的准确性
背景:甲状腺结节是临床上常见的临床表现。细针抽吸细胞学(FNAC)是一种有用的方法之间的良性,可疑和恶性分类的患者。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性分析2015年7月至2017年6月期间在我机构就诊的所有甲状腺手术患者的电子病历。根据Bethesda系统报告甲状腺细胞病理学,对细胞学和组织学数据进行了回顾和关联。结果:257例患者行甲状腺切除术,其中术前FNAC 164例。男女比例为4.9:1。组织学上,52%的结节为良性,48%的结节为恶性。与细胞学诊断相比,FNAC的敏感性为52%,特异性为95%,阳性预测值为92%,阴性预测值为64%,假阳性率为5%,假阴性率为48%。发现总准确率为72%。结论:FNAC是决定患者治疗方案的有用工具,但有局限性,特别是在评估卵泡病变时。这就导致了文献中统计值的计算存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信