The Ethical Issues Surrounding Sections 175-178 of the UK's Data Protection Bill

D. J. Mchenry, Nigel McKelvey
{"title":"The Ethical Issues Surrounding Sections 175-178 of the UK's Data Protection Bill","authors":"D. J. Mchenry, Nigel McKelvey","doi":"10.4018/IJIDE.2019010105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is growing concern that a new data ethics regime that has been introduced into the current draft of the data protection bill may be ethically problematic. The changes are designed to be a framework for data processing but health data privacy advocacy group medconfidential has voiced their concerns at the development. The provider has claimed that the government is trying to push through the regime without first giving the public a chance to engage in discussions about how public-sector data should be stored and processed. This article will discuss ethical issues surrounding the proposed bill as well as big data analytics and will discuss the role played by government in data processing in the UK. It will discuss the arguments for and against the government's proposals. It will be important for the UK government along with all data processors and data controllers to ensure that large amounts of data from all UK citizens across all sectors is handled correctly.","PeriodicalId":373283,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Innov. Digit. Econ.","volume":"26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Innov. Digit. Econ.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJIDE.2019010105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is growing concern that a new data ethics regime that has been introduced into the current draft of the data protection bill may be ethically problematic. The changes are designed to be a framework for data processing but health data privacy advocacy group medconfidential has voiced their concerns at the development. The provider has claimed that the government is trying to push through the regime without first giving the public a chance to engage in discussions about how public-sector data should be stored and processed. This article will discuss ethical issues surrounding the proposed bill as well as big data analytics and will discuss the role played by government in data processing in the UK. It will discuss the arguments for and against the government's proposals. It will be important for the UK government along with all data processors and data controllers to ensure that large amounts of data from all UK citizens across all sectors is handled correctly.
围绕英国数据保护法案第175-178条的道德问题
越来越多的人担心,在当前的数据保护法案草案中引入的新的数据伦理制度可能存在伦理问题。这些变化旨在成为数据处理的框架,但健康数据隐私倡导组织medconfidential表达了他们对这一发展的担忧。该提供商声称,政府试图在没有首先让公众有机会参与讨论如何存储和处理公共部门数据的情况下推行该制度。本文将讨论围绕拟议法案以及大数据分析的道德问题,并将讨论政府在英国数据处理中所扮演的角色。它将讨论支持和反对政府提案的理由。对于英国政府以及所有数据处理者和数据控制者来说,确保来自所有部门的所有英国公民的大量数据得到正确处理是非常重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信