Quality evaluation of web sites: A comparative study of some Multiple Criteria Decision Making methods

Rim Rekik, I. Kallel, A. Alimi
{"title":"Quality evaluation of web sites: A comparative study of some Multiple Criteria Decision Making methods","authors":"Rim Rekik, I. Kallel, A. Alimi","doi":"10.1109/ISDA.2015.7489183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is widely used in everyday life especially to make decisions between conflicted criteria. In this paper, MCDM is explored in the Web domain that plays a major role in the modern society. A web site can provide or not users' needs. Assess the quality of web sites requires a list of criteria and sub-criteria, they depend also on web site category. So, to qualify criteria versus others it is important to resort to Multi-Criteria decision Making method. Weighing criteria, ranking web sites or other purposes of assessment can be resolved by MCDM. This paper identifies and discusses some methods and techniques in this area; it proposes also a comparative study between them and concludes with some findings discussions and future issues.","PeriodicalId":196743,"journal":{"name":"2015 15th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA)","volume":"204 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 15th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications (ISDA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISDA.2015.7489183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) is widely used in everyday life especially to make decisions between conflicted criteria. In this paper, MCDM is explored in the Web domain that plays a major role in the modern society. A web site can provide or not users' needs. Assess the quality of web sites requires a list of criteria and sub-criteria, they depend also on web site category. So, to qualify criteria versus others it is important to resort to Multi-Criteria decision Making method. Weighing criteria, ranking web sites or other purposes of assessment can be resolved by MCDM. This paper identifies and discusses some methods and techniques in this area; it proposes also a comparative study between them and concludes with some findings discussions and future issues.
网站质量评价:几种多准则决策方法的比较研究
多准则决策(Multiple Criteria Decision Making, MCDM)在日常生活中得到了广泛的应用,特别是在相互冲突的准则之间进行决策。本文探讨了在现代社会中发挥重要作用的Web领域中的MCDM。一个网站可以提供或不提供用户的需求。评估网站的质量需要一系列的标准和子标准,它们也取决于网站的类别。因此,将标准与其他标准相比较,采用多标准决策方法是很重要的。衡量标准,排名网站或其他目的的评估可以由MCDM解决。本文对这方面的一些方法和技术进行了探讨;并对两者进行了比较研究,最后提出了一些结论,讨论了未来的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信