Short term outcome evaluation of conservative versus operative treatment of middle third clavicle fractures: A prospective observational study

Dr. Abhishek Kumar Rai, Dixit Bansal, Dr. Bhushan Sunil Hadole, D. Kg
{"title":"Short term outcome evaluation of conservative versus operative treatment of middle third clavicle fractures: A prospective observational study","authors":"Dr. Abhishek Kumar Rai, Dixit Bansal, Dr. Bhushan Sunil Hadole, D. Kg","doi":"10.33545/orthor.2022.v6.i1b.354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The study was conducted to compare the short term outcome between conservative and operative management of middle third clavicle fractures. Materials and Methods: 118 patients with displaced clavicle fractures of both genders were classified into 2 groups of 59 each. Group I patients were treated either by intramedullary nail or open reduction and internal fixation with plate-screw construct and group II patients were managed conservatively on clavicular brace. Patients were evaluated clinically, with the DASH questionnaire and the Constant score. Results: There were 39 males and 20 females in group I and 32 males and 27 females in group II. The mean constant score was 94.2 in group I and 91.4 in group II, DASH score was 4.5 in group I and 3.2 in group I and malunion was seen in 5 in group I and 9 in in group II. The difference was significant ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: The operative group had significantly higher excellent outcome as compared to the conservative group.","PeriodicalId":151163,"journal":{"name":"National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/orthor.2022.v6.i1b.354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The study was conducted to compare the short term outcome between conservative and operative management of middle third clavicle fractures. Materials and Methods: 118 patients with displaced clavicle fractures of both genders were classified into 2 groups of 59 each. Group I patients were treated either by intramedullary nail or open reduction and internal fixation with plate-screw construct and group II patients were managed conservatively on clavicular brace. Patients were evaluated clinically, with the DASH questionnaire and the Constant score. Results: There were 39 males and 20 females in group I and 32 males and 27 females in group II. The mean constant score was 94.2 in group I and 91.4 in group II, DASH score was 4.5 in group I and 3.2 in group I and malunion was seen in 5 in group I and 9 in in group II. The difference was significant ( P < 0.05). Conclusion: The operative group had significantly higher excellent outcome as compared to the conservative group.
保守治疗与手术治疗中三锁骨骨折的短期疗效评价:一项前瞻性观察研究
背景:本研究旨在比较保守治疗与手术治疗中三锁骨骨折的近期疗效。材料与方法:将118例男女锁骨移位骨折患者分为两组,每组59例。ⅰ组患者采用髓内钉或钢板螺钉切开复位内固定,ⅱ组患者采用锁骨支保守治疗。采用DASH问卷和Constant评分对患者进行临床评价。结果:ⅰ组男性39例,女性20例;ⅱ组男性32例,女性27例。I组平均恒分94.2分,II组平均恒分91.4分,I组平均DASH分4.5分,I组平均DASH分3.2分,I组5例,II组9例出现不愈合。差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:手术组的优良率明显高于保守组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信