Is Computed Tomography an Alternative to Scintigraphy for Preoperative Evaluation of Living Kidney Donor Split Renal Function?

Bekir Voyvoda, N. Voyvoda, Ömür Memik, Onur Karslı
{"title":"Is Computed Tomography an Alternative to Scintigraphy for Preoperative Evaluation of Living Kidney Donor Split Renal Function?","authors":"Bekir Voyvoda, N. Voyvoda, Ömür Memik, Onur Karslı","doi":"10.5505/gju.2022.70288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) can replace scintigraphy for the preoperative evaluation of split renal function (SRF) and to determine the agreement between different CT volumetric measurement methods used so as to demonstrate this function. Materials and Methods : The split renal function (SRF) percentage of living kidney donor candidates was determined by diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid ( DTPA) perfusion scintigraphy. The modified ellipsoid volume (MELV), semi-automatic total kidney volume (STKV) and semi-automatic renal cortex volume (SRCV) of the candidates who underwent contrast-enhanced CT were measured and the percentages of both kidney volumes were calculated. The inter-method agreement was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation test and the Bland-Altman plot test. Results: There was no correlation between the right and left kidney SRF and MELV (r=-0.033 and r=-0.092), MELV% (r=0.076 and r=0.076), STKV (r=-0.005 and r=-0.120), STKV% (r=0.175 and r=0.172), SRCV (r=-0.001 and r=0.130) and SRCV% (r=0.205 and r=0.183). There were significant correlations between the right MELV and STKV (r=0.855) and SRCV (r=0.813), and between the left MELV and STKV (r=0.787) and SRCV (r=0.770). Conclusion: Although CT provided detailed preoperative anatomical information, volumetric measurements did not show agreement with SRF. The agreement of each 3 volumetric examinations within themselves made us think that disagreement with SRF was independent of the volumetric method chosen.","PeriodicalId":266572,"journal":{"name":"GRAND JOURNAL OF UROLOGY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GRAND JOURNAL OF UROLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5505/gju.2022.70288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) can replace scintigraphy for the preoperative evaluation of split renal function (SRF) and to determine the agreement between different CT volumetric measurement methods used so as to demonstrate this function. Materials and Methods : The split renal function (SRF) percentage of living kidney donor candidates was determined by diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid ( DTPA) perfusion scintigraphy. The modified ellipsoid volume (MELV), semi-automatic total kidney volume (STKV) and semi-automatic renal cortex volume (SRCV) of the candidates who underwent contrast-enhanced CT were measured and the percentages of both kidney volumes were calculated. The inter-method agreement was evaluated using Pearson’s correlation test and the Bland-Altman plot test. Results: There was no correlation between the right and left kidney SRF and MELV (r=-0.033 and r=-0.092), MELV% (r=0.076 and r=0.076), STKV (r=-0.005 and r=-0.120), STKV% (r=0.175 and r=0.172), SRCV (r=-0.001 and r=0.130) and SRCV% (r=0.205 and r=0.183). There were significant correlations between the right MELV and STKV (r=0.855) and SRCV (r=0.813), and between the left MELV and STKV (r=0.787) and SRCV (r=0.770). Conclusion: Although CT provided detailed preoperative anatomical information, volumetric measurements did not show agreement with SRF. The agreement of each 3 volumetric examinations within themselves made us think that disagreement with SRF was independent of the volumetric method chosen.
计算机断层扫描是活体肾供者肾分裂功能术前评估的替代方法吗?
目的:本研究旨在评估计算机断层扫描(CT)是否可以取代闪烁成像(scintigraphy)来评估裂肾功能(SRF)的术前评估,并确定不同CT体积测量方法之间的一致性,以证明这一功能。材料与方法:采用二乙烯三胺五乙酸(DTPA)灌注显像法测定候选活体肾供体的分裂肾功能(SRF)百分比。测量候选患者行CT增强后的改良椭球体积(MELV)、半自动肾总体积(STKV)和半自动肾皮质体积(SRCV),并计算两种肾脏体积的百分比。采用Pearson相关检验和Bland-Altman图检验评价方法间一致性。结果:左、右肾SRF与MELV (r=-0.033、r=-0.092)、MELV% (r=0.076、r=0.076)、STKV (r=-0.005、r=-0.120)、STKV% (r=0.175、r=0.172)、SRCV (r=-0.001、r=0.130)、SRCV% (r=0.205、r=0.183)无相关性。右侧MELV和STKV (r=0.855)与SRCV (r=0.813)、左侧MELV和STKV (r=0.787)与SRCV (r=0.770)存在显著相关性。结论:尽管CT提供了详细的术前解剖信息,但体积测量结果与SRF不一致。每3个体积检查本身的一致性使我们认为与SRF的分歧与所选择的体积方法无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信