Effect of Reward System on Male Participation in Surgical Contraceptive Method

S. Suwarsi, Casnuri Casnuri, Fika Lilik Indrawati, Merita Eka Rahmuniyati
{"title":"Effect of Reward System on Male Participation in Surgical Contraceptive Method","authors":"S. Suwarsi, Casnuri Casnuri, Fika Lilik Indrawati, Merita Eka Rahmuniyati","doi":"10.24990/INJEC.V3I2.206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The participation of men in the surgical contraceptive method (MOP) has not increased even though in some regencies or cities in Indonesia. There has been a reward program for men who want to join the MOP. This study was to determine the relationship of interest with the reward system for prospective MOP acceptors. Methods: Quantitative study with observational analytic approach, cross-sectional time design with two groups. The total sample of 60 men was taken by purposive sampling according to the inclusion criteria. Data is taken through a measuring instrument in the form of a questionnaire.  Bivariate analysis with chi-square test. Results: Respondents 'interest in family planning MOP in no system reward was mostly low at 21 people (70%), while the respondents' interest in family planning MOP in system reward was mostly good at 18 people (60%). There is no difference in interest in prospective MOP family planning acceptors between Districts with reward system and without reward system. There is a correlation between interest and reward (p = 0.007) in the Regency with reward and without reward system. Conclusions: There is no difference in interest between candidates for Family Planning MOP acceptors between reward and without reward system.","PeriodicalId":431220,"journal":{"name":"INDONESIAN NURSING JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND CLINIC (INJEC)","volume":"182 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INDONESIAN NURSING JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND CLINIC (INJEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24990/INJEC.V3I2.206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The participation of men in the surgical contraceptive method (MOP) has not increased even though in some regencies or cities in Indonesia. There has been a reward program for men who want to join the MOP. This study was to determine the relationship of interest with the reward system for prospective MOP acceptors. Methods: Quantitative study with observational analytic approach, cross-sectional time design with two groups. The total sample of 60 men was taken by purposive sampling according to the inclusion criteria. Data is taken through a measuring instrument in the form of a questionnaire.  Bivariate analysis with chi-square test. Results: Respondents 'interest in family planning MOP in no system reward was mostly low at 21 people (70%), while the respondents' interest in family planning MOP in system reward was mostly good at 18 people (60%). There is no difference in interest in prospective MOP family planning acceptors between Districts with reward system and without reward system. There is a correlation between interest and reward (p = 0.007) in the Regency with reward and without reward system. Conclusions: There is no difference in interest between candidates for Family Planning MOP acceptors between reward and without reward system.
奖励制度对男性参与手术避孕的影响
引言:即使在印度尼西亚的一些县或城市,男性参与手术避孕方法(MOP)的人数也没有增加。对于想要加入MOP的男性,有一个奖励计划。本研究旨在确定潜在MOP受体的兴趣与奖励系统的关系。方法:采用观察分析法进行定量研究,采用两组横断面时间设计。按纳入标准进行有目的抽样,共抽样60例男性。数据是通过问卷形式的测量仪器获取的。卡方检验的双变量分析。结果:被调查者对无制度奖励的计划生育MOP的兴趣多为21人(70%),对有制度奖励的计划生育MOP的兴趣多为18人(60%)。有奖励制度的地区和没有奖励制度的地区对计划生育准接受者的兴趣没有差异。在《摄政》中,利息和奖励之间存在相关性(p = 0.007)。结论:有奖励与无奖励制度下计划生育MOP接受者的兴趣无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信