The Ontology of Documents, Revisited

J. Furner
{"title":"The Ontology of Documents, Revisited","authors":"J. Furner","doi":"10.35492/docam/6/1/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three contributions are made to understanding the nature of documents. A survey of definitions of \"document\" from the last century shows that those definitions which most accurately reflect the ways in which the term \"document\" is used in practice are typically compound definitions, consisting of two or three elements that each refer to a different function of documents: medium, message, and meaning. Locating documents in E. J. Lowe's four-category ontology results in consideration of documents as universals rather than as particulars. Analysis of B. Smith's theory of document acts suggest that all documents, not just the ones that are involved in declarations, are creative in the special sense that they are generative of quasi-abstract entities of the kind that collectively comprise social reality.","PeriodicalId":309087,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings from the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Document Academy","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings from the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Document Academy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35492/docam/6/1/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Three contributions are made to understanding the nature of documents. A survey of definitions of "document" from the last century shows that those definitions which most accurately reflect the ways in which the term "document" is used in practice are typically compound definitions, consisting of two or three elements that each refer to a different function of documents: medium, message, and meaning. Locating documents in E. J. Lowe's four-category ontology results in consideration of documents as universals rather than as particulars. Analysis of B. Smith's theory of document acts suggest that all documents, not just the ones that are involved in declarations, are creative in the special sense that they are generative of quasi-abstract entities of the kind that collectively comprise social reality.
文献本体论,重访
对于理解文档的本质有三个贡献。对上个世纪以来“文件”定义的调查表明,那些最准确地反映“文件”一词在实践中的使用方式的定义通常是复合定义,由两三个元素组成,每个元素都涉及文件的不同功能:媒介、信息和意义。在E. J. Lowe的四范畴本体中定位文档导致将文档视为普遍的而不是具体的。对B. Smith的文件行为理论的分析表明,所有的文件,不仅仅是那些涉及到声明的文件,在特殊意义上都是创造性的,因为它们是共同构成社会现实的那种准抽象实体的生成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信