HUMAN DIGNITY AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND IRELAND AND RULE OF LAW REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT – CHARTING THE FRAGILE PATH OF PROGRESS

J. Scutt
{"title":"HUMAN DIGNITY AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IN SOUTH AFRICA AND IRELAND AND RULE OF LAW REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT – CHARTING THE FRAGILE PATH OF PROGRESS","authors":"J. Scutt","doi":"10.5750/DLJ.V27I0.1115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"These two scholarly and accessible works stand in their own right, whilst being complementary. Each affirms and expands on what Magna Carta is believed to embody. They engage with the struggle to ensure that law is a living branch of learning and praxis, advancing not only notions of rights but fixing them firmly into the interstices not only of legal decision–making, but throughout the legal systems they address and the societies thereby regulated. Rule of Law is the more straightforward of the two. Human dignity and fundamental rights is more complex. Yet both acknowledge the vital importance of law and justice as the basis of a good, decent and just society. Each questions how best this can be achieved.","PeriodicalId":382436,"journal":{"name":"The Denning Law Journal","volume":"229 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Denning Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/DLJ.V27I0.1115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

These two scholarly and accessible works stand in their own right, whilst being complementary. Each affirms and expands on what Magna Carta is believed to embody. They engage with the struggle to ensure that law is a living branch of learning and praxis, advancing not only notions of rights but fixing them firmly into the interstices not only of legal decision–making, but throughout the legal systems they address and the societies thereby regulated. Rule of Law is the more straightforward of the two. Human dignity and fundamental rights is more complex. Yet both acknowledge the vital importance of law and justice as the basis of a good, decent and just society. Each questions how best this can be achieved.
南非和爱尔兰的人的尊严和基本权利以及法治改革和发展- -描绘了脆弱的进步道路
这两个学术和通俗易懂的作品站在自己的权利,同时是互补的。每一个都肯定并扩展了人们认为《大宪章》所体现的内容。他们参与斗争,以确保法律是学习和实践的一个活生生的分支,不仅推进权利的概念,而且将它们牢固地固定在法律决策的间隙中,而且贯穿于他们所涉及的法律体系和由此规范的社会。法治是两者中更为直接的一个。人的尊严和基本权利更为复杂。然而,两者都承认法律和正义至关重要,是一个良好、体面和公正社会的基础。每个问题都是如何最好地实现这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信