Proposal for a digital forensic investigation model in accordance with the legislation in Mexico

Carlos Ortega-Laurel, J. Sandoval-Gutiérrez, J. López-Sauceda, Adan Fernando Serrano-Orozco
{"title":"Proposal for a digital forensic investigation model in accordance with the legislation in Mexico","authors":"Carlos Ortega-Laurel, J. Sandoval-Gutiérrez, J. López-Sauceda, Adan Fernando Serrano-Orozco","doi":"10.35429/ejs.2019.11.6.1.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we collect and observes the existing digital forensic investigation models, which are essentially the application of information systems and communications engineering for forensic purposes. In addition, a review of the federal criminal situation in Mexico is presented (through the revision of the regulations in the Federal Criminal Code), because the Code indirectly describes the reality of what can be prosecuted and admitted as evidence, criminally speaking, with the application of digital forensic investigation models in Mexico. This is due to the significant deficiency in the proposal of digital forensic investigation models, in which there is not enough emphasis on the potential admissibility of the evidence gathered through the models, to give attention to the need to provide “evidence” to Institutions responsible for the impartation of justice, as if doing digital forensic investigation to be a technological issue and not as it really is: a socio-legal-technological issue. Therefore, considering the criminal reality in Mexico, locating the practices of existing models that make sense in accordance with the norm, an abbreviated model is proposed that really helps successful prosecutions.","PeriodicalId":185474,"journal":{"name":"ECORFAN Journal Spain","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECORFAN Journal Spain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35429/ejs.2019.11.6.1.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper we collect and observes the existing digital forensic investigation models, which are essentially the application of information systems and communications engineering for forensic purposes. In addition, a review of the federal criminal situation in Mexico is presented (through the revision of the regulations in the Federal Criminal Code), because the Code indirectly describes the reality of what can be prosecuted and admitted as evidence, criminally speaking, with the application of digital forensic investigation models in Mexico. This is due to the significant deficiency in the proposal of digital forensic investigation models, in which there is not enough emphasis on the potential admissibility of the evidence gathered through the models, to give attention to the need to provide “evidence” to Institutions responsible for the impartation of justice, as if doing digital forensic investigation to be a technological issue and not as it really is: a socio-legal-technological issue. Therefore, considering the criminal reality in Mexico, locating the practices of existing models that make sense in accordance with the norm, an abbreviated model is proposed that really helps successful prosecutions.
根据墨西哥立法提出数字法医调查模式的建议
本文收集和观察了现有的数字法医调查模型,这些模型本质上是信息系统和通信工程在法医领域的应用。此外,还对墨西哥的联邦刑事情况进行了审查(通过修订《联邦刑法》中的规定),因为《联邦刑法》间接描述了在墨西哥应用数字法医调查模型时可以起诉和作为证据的现实情况。这是由于数字法医调查模式的建议存在重大缺陷,其中没有足够强调通过模型收集的证据的潜在可采性,而没有注意到需要向负责司法的机构提供“证据”,好像做数字法医调查是一个技术问题,而不是真正的问题:一个社会法律技术问题。因此,考虑到墨西哥的犯罪现实,根据规范找到现有模式中有意义的做法,提出一个真正有助于成功起诉的简化模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信