TECHNOLOGY MAJORS’ METHODOLOGY EDUCATION: COMPARING APPROACHES FROM TWO COURSES

A. Rissanen, K. Saastamoinen
{"title":"TECHNOLOGY MAJORS’ METHODOLOGY EDUCATION: COMPARING APPROACHES FROM TWO COURSES","authors":"A. Rissanen, K. Saastamoinen","doi":"10.33225/balticste/2021.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Defense University (NDU) trains officers to develop their academic and professional skills. To accomplish this, the university offers two mandatory courses on methodological training for military technology students for master level education. The first course was theoretically oriented, and the second course was practically oriented. These both master-level methodology courses emphasize practice oriented mathematical skills, which officers use in their operative decision-making and statistical analysis. This study focuses on student-centered learning methodologies linked to teachers’ observations from current and previous course implementations. Results in this study described the outcome from the first run of the revised curriculum. We collected data from students’ course reports and the university’s standard student evaluation of teaching (SET). According to the SET, the course 2 which was practically oriented course, where groups worked on more significant projects gained higher value among students. In conclusion, we recommend that teachers continue using student-centered learning methodologies to technical students as much as possible. Theoretically underscored courses should also contain more practical examples. Keywords: distance education, flipped learning, learning by doing, research methodology, student-centered learning","PeriodicalId":153915,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2021), Šiauliai, 21–22 June, 2021","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Baltic Symposium on Science and Technology Education (BalticSTE2021), Šiauliai, 21–22 June, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/balticste/2021.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Defense University (NDU) trains officers to develop their academic and professional skills. To accomplish this, the university offers two mandatory courses on methodological training for military technology students for master level education. The first course was theoretically oriented, and the second course was practically oriented. These both master-level methodology courses emphasize practice oriented mathematical skills, which officers use in their operative decision-making and statistical analysis. This study focuses on student-centered learning methodologies linked to teachers’ observations from current and previous course implementations. Results in this study described the outcome from the first run of the revised curriculum. We collected data from students’ course reports and the university’s standard student evaluation of teaching (SET). According to the SET, the course 2 which was practically oriented course, where groups worked on more significant projects gained higher value among students. In conclusion, we recommend that teachers continue using student-centered learning methodologies to technical students as much as possible. Theoretically underscored courses should also contain more practical examples. Keywords: distance education, flipped learning, learning by doing, research methodology, student-centered learning
技术类专业方法论教育:两门课程的方法比较
国防大学(NDU)训练军官发展他们的学术和专业技能。为了实现这一目标,该大学为军事技术专业的研究生提供了两门必修的方法论培训课程。第一个课程是理论导向,第二个课程是实践导向。这两门硕士水平的方法论课程都强调以实践为导向的数学技能,这些技能是官员在操作决策和统计分析中使用的。本研究关注以学生为中心的学习方法,并结合教师对当前和以前课程实施的观察。本研究的结果描述了修订后课程第一次运行的结果。我们从学生的课程报告和学校的标准学生教学评估(SET)中收集数据。根据SET,课程2以实践为导向,小组进行更重要的项目,在学生中获得了更高的价值。总之,我们建议教师继续尽可能多地使用以学生为中心的学习方法来指导学生。理论上强调的课程也应该包含更多的实际例子。关键词:远程教育,翻转学习,做中学,研究方法论,以学生为中心的学习
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信