Neighborhood watch: On network coding throughput and key sharing

Martin Strohmeier, I. Martinovic, U. Roedig, Karim M. El Defrawy, J. Schmitt
{"title":"Neighborhood watch: On network coding throughput and key sharing","authors":"Martin Strohmeier, I. Martinovic, U. Roedig, Karim M. El Defrawy, J. Schmitt","doi":"10.1109/GLOCOM.2013.6831179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Network coding (NC) has frequently been promoted as an approach for improving throughput in wireless networks. Existing work has mostly focused on the fundamental aspects of NC, while constraints arising in real-world network deployments have not received much attention. In particular, NC requires network nodes to overhear each other's packets, which oftentimes contradicts many security standards that attempt to provide link-layer confidentiality, e.g., by utilizing pairwise encryption keys as is the case IEEE 802.11i and ZigBee. There is an inherent trade-off between gains from NC and link-layer security: if many nodes share the secret link-layer key, NC will improve throughput, yet a leakage of the key will affect many nodes. On the other hand, having distinct secret keys will increase resilience against key compromise, but will also minimize the coding gain. We formulate this security vs. performance trade-off as an optimization problem and evaluate the effectiveness of NC under different sizes of key-sharing groups and network topologies. Our results show that increasing the key-sharing group by a single node can result in a maximum coding gain between 1.3% and 13.7%.","PeriodicalId":233798,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2013.6831179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network coding (NC) has frequently been promoted as an approach for improving throughput in wireless networks. Existing work has mostly focused on the fundamental aspects of NC, while constraints arising in real-world network deployments have not received much attention. In particular, NC requires network nodes to overhear each other's packets, which oftentimes contradicts many security standards that attempt to provide link-layer confidentiality, e.g., by utilizing pairwise encryption keys as is the case IEEE 802.11i and ZigBee. There is an inherent trade-off between gains from NC and link-layer security: if many nodes share the secret link-layer key, NC will improve throughput, yet a leakage of the key will affect many nodes. On the other hand, having distinct secret keys will increase resilience against key compromise, but will also minimize the coding gain. We formulate this security vs. performance trade-off as an optimization problem and evaluate the effectiveness of NC under different sizes of key-sharing groups and network topologies. Our results show that increasing the key-sharing group by a single node can result in a maximum coding gain between 1.3% and 13.7%.
邻里监视:关于网络编码吞吐量和密钥共享
网络编码(NC)作为一种提高无线网络吞吐量的方法经常被推广。现有的工作主要集中在NC的基本方面,而在实际网络部署中产生的限制并没有得到太多的关注。特别是,NC要求网络节点监听彼此的数据包,这通常与许多试图提供链路层机密性的安全标准相矛盾,例如,通过使用配对加密密钥,如IEEE 802.11i和ZigBee。NC和链路层安全之间存在一种内在的权衡:如果许多节点共享秘密链路层密钥,NC将提高吞吐量,但密钥泄露将影响许多节点。另一方面,拥有不同的密钥将增加防止密钥泄露的弹性,但也将最小化编码增益。我们将这种安全性与性能的权衡表述为一个优化问题,并评估了NC在不同大小的密钥共享组和网络拓扑结构下的有效性。结果表明,每增加一个节点,密钥共享组的最大编码增益在1.3%到13.7%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信