{"title":"HISTORICAL FACTUALIZATION OF THE THEORY OF OPPOSITION (BY THE EXAMPLE OF THE CREATION ‒ DESTRUCTION DICHOTOMY)","authors":"Lidia B. Zdanovskaya, Lidia A. Isaeva","doi":"10.12731/2077-1770-2023-15-1-171-186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. The growing trend of introducing numerous information resources into the socio-cultural space of modern society has contributed to the increased popularity of scientific works devoted to the range of aspects of political discourse analysis and the conceptual opposition associated with it which forms the basis of the “Creation ‒ Destruction” dichotomy under study. \nPurpose. The article is devoted to the study of linguo-pragmatic reasons for specific forms of opposition in political discourse. \nMaterials and methods. The material for this article were the works of famous Russian and European researches, representatives of the leading scientific schools of linguocognitology devoted to the theoretical issues of conceptual opposition, as well as the book of the American investigative journalist B. Woodward Fear: Trump in the White House. When writing the article, the following methods were used: comparative, discursive, contextual analysis. \nResults. In the course of the study, the conditions for the emergence of opposition processes are analyzed. Various approaches to the linguocognitive description of opposition have been systematized. On the example of the dichotomy “Creation ‒ Destruction”, a characteristic description of the action as a key factor in the implementation of opposition in political discourse is presented. \nPractical implications. The actual results of the study can find implementation in the preparation of educational and methodological material on the linquocognitive analysis of concepts as part of dichotomous models.","PeriodicalId":288940,"journal":{"name":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsialnykh problem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12731/2077-1770-2023-15-1-171-186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background. The growing trend of introducing numerous information resources into the socio-cultural space of modern society has contributed to the increased popularity of scientific works devoted to the range of aspects of political discourse analysis and the conceptual opposition associated with it which forms the basis of the “Creation ‒ Destruction” dichotomy under study.
Purpose. The article is devoted to the study of linguo-pragmatic reasons for specific forms of opposition in political discourse.
Materials and methods. The material for this article were the works of famous Russian and European researches, representatives of the leading scientific schools of linguocognitology devoted to the theoretical issues of conceptual opposition, as well as the book of the American investigative journalist B. Woodward Fear: Trump in the White House. When writing the article, the following methods were used: comparative, discursive, contextual analysis.
Results. In the course of the study, the conditions for the emergence of opposition processes are analyzed. Various approaches to the linguocognitive description of opposition have been systematized. On the example of the dichotomy “Creation ‒ Destruction”, a characteristic description of the action as a key factor in the implementation of opposition in political discourse is presented.
Practical implications. The actual results of the study can find implementation in the preparation of educational and methodological material on the linquocognitive analysis of concepts as part of dichotomous models.
背景。将大量信息资源引入现代社会的社会文化空间的日益增长的趋势,促进了致力于政治话语分析的各个方面以及与之相关的概念对立的科学著作的日益普及,这些著作构成了所研究的“创造-破坏”二分法的基础。目的。本文致力于研究政治话语中特定形式的反对的语言语用原因。材料和方法。本文的材料是俄罗斯和欧洲著名研究人员的作品,是致力于概念对立理论问题的语言认知学主要科学流派的代表,以及美国调查记者B. Woodward Fear: Trump in The White House的书。在写这篇文章时,使用了以下方法:比较分析,话语分析,语境分析。结果。在研究过程中,分析了对立过程产生的条件。对立的语言认知描述的各种方法已经系统化。本文以“创造-毁灭”的二分法为例,对作为政治话语中反对派实施的关键因素的行动进行了特征描述。实际意义。研究的实际结果可以在编写作为二分模型一部分的概念的关联认知分析的教育和方法材料中得到实施。