Requirements-based development of BPMN extensions: The case of clinical pathways

2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM) Pub Date : 2014-09-08 DOI:10.1109/REBPM.2014.6890734

Richard Braun, H. Schlieter

{"title":"Requirements-based development of BPMN extensions: The case of clinical pathways","authors":"Richard Braun, H. Schlieter","doi":"10.1109/REBPM.2014.6890734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) has evolved to one of the most applied modelling General Purpose Languages in the Business Process Management discipline. Due to its application in different domains, it becomes frequently necessary to extend the BPMN by domain-specific concepts. Extending the BPMN fosters an adequate communication between system engineers and domain experts and enhances the semantically correct representation of the domain. Therefore, the BPMN meta-model provides an extension mechanism. However, there is a remarkable lack in procedure models for the design of such extensions. This research article outlines an extension method that focuses on domain analysis, extension requirements and the derivation of domain-specific extension concepts within BPMN. Therefore, the method of STROPPI ET AL. (2011) is extended in regard to domain analysis. The approach is motivated and demonstrated by the case of Clinical Pathways (CPs).","PeriodicalId":134982,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/REBPM.2014.6890734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 23

Abstract

In recent years, the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) has evolved to one of the most applied modelling General Purpose Languages in the Business Process Management discipline. Due to its application in different domains, it becomes frequently necessary to extend the BPMN by domain-specific concepts. Extending the BPMN fosters an adequate communication between system engineers and domain experts and enhances the semantically correct representation of the domain. Therefore, the BPMN meta-model provides an extension mechanism. However, there is a remarkable lack in procedure models for the design of such extensions. This research article outlines an extension method that focuses on domain analysis, extension requirements and the derivation of domain-specific extension concepts within BPMN. Therefore, the method of STROPPI ET AL. (2011) is extended in regard to domain analysis. The approach is motivated and demonstrated by the case of Clinical Pathways (CPs).

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于需求的BPMN扩展开发:临床路径的案例

近年来，业务流程模型和符号(BPMN)已经发展成为业务流程管理规程中应用最广泛的建模通用语言之一。由于BPMN在不同领域的应用，经常需要通过特定于领域的概念来扩展BPMN。扩展BPMN促进了系统工程师和领域专家之间的充分沟通，并增强了领域的语义正确表示。因此，BPMN元模型提供了一种扩展机制。然而，设计这类扩展的过程模型明显缺乏。这篇研究文章概述了一种扩展方法，该方法侧重于BPMN中的领域分析、扩展需求和特定于领域的扩展概念的派生。因此，对STROPPI ET AL.(2011)的方法在域分析方面进行了扩展。该方法是由临床途径(CPs)的案例激发和证明的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2014 IEEE 1st International Workshop on the Interrelations between Requirements Engineering and Business Process Management (REBPM)

自引率

0.00%

发文量