When is 3 plus 1 equal to 3.1? Suggested methods of examining wage settlements to determine their annual rate of adjustment

J. Ansell, P. Brosnan, R. Harbridge
{"title":"When is 3 plus 1 equal to 3.1? Suggested methods of examining wage settlements to determine their annual rate of adjustment","authors":"J. Ansell, P. Brosnan, R. Harbridge","doi":"10.26686/nzjir.v15i1.7563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One focus in the current debate over labour market \"flexibility\" has been the extent to which there is a dispersion of wage settlements. But determining the degree of dispersion is no easy task. With the abandonment of the \"12 month rule\", which had applied in the legislation from 1974, a proportion of documents now have terms greater or less than 12 months. Harbridge (1988) found that 13 percent of the documents negotiated in the 1986-87 wage round had terms other than 12 months with a range from 3.5 to 17.5 months.","PeriodicalId":365392,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand journal of industrial relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/nzjir.v15i1.7563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

One focus in the current debate over labour market "flexibility" has been the extent to which there is a dispersion of wage settlements. But determining the degree of dispersion is no easy task. With the abandonment of the "12 month rule", which had applied in the legislation from 1974, a proportion of documents now have terms greater or less than 12 months. Harbridge (1988) found that 13 percent of the documents negotiated in the 1986-87 wage round had terms other than 12 months with a range from 3.5 to 17.5 months.
什么时候3加1等于3.1?建议审查工资结算以确定其年度调整率的方法
在当前有关劳动力市场“灵活性”的辩论中,一个焦点是工资解决方案的分散程度。但要确定分散程度并非易事。由于放弃了1974年以来在立法中适用的“12个月规则”,现在有一部分文件的期限大于或小于12个月。Harbridge(1988)发现,在1986-87年工资谈判中,13%的谈判文件的期限不是12个月,范围从3.5个月到17.5个月不等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信