When to Use European Consensus

D. Kagiaros
{"title":"When to Use European Consensus","authors":"D. Kagiaros","doi":"10.1017/9781108564779.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"European consensus (EuC) is an interpretative tool employed by the European Court of Human Rights (henceforth ‘the Court’) and constitutes a fundamental aspect of its decision-making process. At a time when the legitimacy of the Court as the ultimate arbiter of human rights protection in Europe is under challenge by many of the Contracting Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’ or ‘the Convention’), consensus-based interpretation provides a useful means to legitimise the Court’s judgments and ensure their enforcement.","PeriodicalId":192738,"journal":{"name":"Building Consensus on European Consensus","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Consensus on European Consensus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108564779.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

European consensus (EuC) is an interpretative tool employed by the European Court of Human Rights (henceforth ‘the Court’) and constitutes a fundamental aspect of its decision-making process. At a time when the legitimacy of the Court as the ultimate arbiter of human rights protection in Europe is under challenge by many of the Contracting Parties to the European Convention on Human Rights (‘ECHR’ or ‘the Convention’), consensus-based interpretation provides a useful means to legitimise the Court’s judgments and ensure their enforcement.
何时使用欧洲共识
欧洲协商一致是欧洲人权法院(以下简称“法院”)使用的一种解释性工具,是其决策过程的一个基本方面。当欧洲法院作为欧洲人权保护的最终仲裁者的合法性受到《欧洲人权公约》(ECHR或《公约》)的许多缔约国的挑战时,基于共识的解释提供了一种有用的手段,使法院的判决合法化并确保其执行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信