Company Law as a Restriction to Free Movement – Examination of the Notion of 'Restriction' Using Company Law as the Frame of Reference

K. Sørensen
{"title":"Company Law as a Restriction to Free Movement – Examination of the Notion of 'Restriction' Using Company Law as the Frame of Reference","authors":"K. Sørensen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2386145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focusing on recent judgments from the Court of Justice of the European Union this article investigates how the notion of ‘restriction’ – which is the first step in examining whether there is an infringement of the free movement rights – is used in cases involving company law measures. There is evidence that non-discriminatory obstacles to free movement found in company law can be restrictions. However, recent cases show that the Court may be willing to apply a more restrictive approach where only non-discriminatory measures that have a qualified deterrent effect may constitute restrictions. Furthermore, the article examines when measures undertaken by private parties – for instance when adopting articles of association – may constitute restrictions and finally the relationship between secondary EU-law and the free movement right is discussed.","PeriodicalId":114900,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Corporate Governance International (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2386145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Focusing on recent judgments from the Court of Justice of the European Union this article investigates how the notion of ‘restriction’ – which is the first step in examining whether there is an infringement of the free movement rights – is used in cases involving company law measures. There is evidence that non-discriminatory obstacles to free movement found in company law can be restrictions. However, recent cases show that the Court may be willing to apply a more restrictive approach where only non-discriminatory measures that have a qualified deterrent effect may constitute restrictions. Furthermore, the article examines when measures undertaken by private parties – for instance when adopting articles of association – may constitute restrictions and finally the relationship between secondary EU-law and the free movement right is discussed.
公司法对自由流动的限制——以公司法为参考框架审视“限制”概念
本文以欧盟法院最近的判决为重点,调查了“限制”的概念如何在涉及公司法措施的案件中使用,这是审查是否存在侵犯自由流动权的第一步。有证据表明,公司法中对自由流动的非歧视性障碍可以成为限制。然而,最近的案件表明,法院可能愿意采取一种限制性更强的办法,只有具有合格威慑作用的非歧视性措施才可能构成限制。此外,本文还审查了私人方面采取的措施- -例如通过公司章程时- -何时可能构成限制,最后讨论了次级欧盟法与自由流动权之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信