Fiduciary Principles in Agency Law

Deborah A. DeMott
{"title":"Fiduciary Principles in Agency Law","authors":"Deborah A. DeMott","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190634100.013.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter identifies the fiduciary principles that are integral to agency relationships as defined by the common law and explores their implications. In contrast to relationships in which a fact-specific assessment of a relationship and its circumstances trigger the application of fiduciary duties, agency relationships are categorically treated as fiduciary. When a relationship of common-law agency links two persons, one person’s actions can directly carry legal significance for the other. Agency doctrine defines and imposes formal structure on consensual relationships in which one actor has legally consequential power to represent the other, encompassing externally oriented consequences for the principal, the agent, and third parties, as well as internally oriented rights and duties between agent and principal. An agent functions not as a substitute for the principal but as an extension of the principal’s legal personality in dealings with third parties and other externally oriented conduct within the scope of the agency relationship, including knowledge of facts acquired by the agent when material to the agent’s duties. The potentially grave impact for the principal, plus the implications for personal autonomy when one person represents another, underlie the requisites that define an agency relationship, including its fiduciary character.","PeriodicalId":376950,"journal":{"name":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fiduciary Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190634100.013.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter identifies the fiduciary principles that are integral to agency relationships as defined by the common law and explores their implications. In contrast to relationships in which a fact-specific assessment of a relationship and its circumstances trigger the application of fiduciary duties, agency relationships are categorically treated as fiduciary. When a relationship of common-law agency links two persons, one person’s actions can directly carry legal significance for the other. Agency doctrine defines and imposes formal structure on consensual relationships in which one actor has legally consequential power to represent the other, encompassing externally oriented consequences for the principal, the agent, and third parties, as well as internally oriented rights and duties between agent and principal. An agent functions not as a substitute for the principal but as an extension of the principal’s legal personality in dealings with third parties and other externally oriented conduct within the scope of the agency relationship, including knowledge of facts acquired by the agent when material to the agent’s duties. The potentially grave impact for the principal, plus the implications for personal autonomy when one person represents another, underlie the requisites that define an agency relationship, including its fiduciary character.
代理法中的信义原则
本章确定了普通法所定义的代理关系中不可或缺的信义原则,并探讨了其含义。与对一种关系及其情况的具体事实评估触发信义义务适用的关系相反,代理关系被明确地视为信义关系。当普通法代理关系将两个人联系在一起时,一方的行为可以直接对另一方产生法律意义。代理原则定义并规定了双方同意的关系的正式结构,在这种关系中,一个行为者具有代表另一个行为者的法律后果权力,包括对委托人、代理人和第三方的外部导向的后果,以及代理人和委托人之间的内部导向的权利和义务。代理人的作用不是作为委托人的替代品,而是作为委托人在与第三方打交道和在代理关系范围内进行其他面向外部的行为时法人人格的延伸,包括代理人在对其职责重要时所获得的事实的了解。对委托人的潜在严重影响,加上当一个人代表另一个人时对个人自主权的影响,构成了定义代理关系的必要条件,包括其信义性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信