Education Research: Predictors of Resident Physician Comfort With Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Hannah Shapiro, Julia Frueh, Madeline Chiujdea, S. Sillau, J. Sanders
{"title":"Education Research: Predictors of Resident Physician Comfort With Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities","authors":"Hannah Shapiro, Julia Frueh, Madeline Chiujdea, S. Sillau, J. Sanders","doi":"10.1212/ne9.0000000000200045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) experience worse health outcomes compared with peers without a disability partly due to difficulties accessing age-appropriate health care. Provider discomfort with interacting and caring for individuals with IDD is a primary barrier to accessing care. The objectives of this study were to describe resident physicians' education, experiences, and comfort levels regarding individuals with IDD and to identify predictors of higher comfort levels with this patient population.In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed medical trainees in 7 residency programs in Boston, Massachusetts on their education, experiences, and comfort levels regarding individuals with IDD. The comfort level was assessed directly on a 6-point Likert scale. The relationship between comfort regarding people with IDD and several candidate explanatory variables was explored with Spearman and partial Spearman correlations (rs).The estimated survey response rate was 49%. Of 423 resident physicians included in the study, 96% reported they had treated a patient with IDD, while only 25% reported having formal education on caring for this population. On a scale of 1–6, with higher numbers corresponding to greater comfort, the mean comfort level treating individuals with IDD was 3.73 (CI 3.61–3.85). In bivariant analyses, the amount of prior experience with people with IDD had a moderate, positive correlation with increased comfort levels treating individuals with IDD (rs= 0.42,p< 0.01). The following characteristics had a weak, positive correlation with increased comfort levels: training in a pediatric-focused residency specialty (rs= 0.18,p< 0.01), number of hours of formal education on caring for people with IDD (rs= 0.15,p< 0.01), and age (rs= 0.12,p= 0.03). Only the amount of prior experience with this patient population remained positively correlated with higher comfort levels when the other variables were controlled for (rs= 0.38,p< 0.01).Prior experience with individuals with IDD predicted higher comfort levels with this population. This study supports the need for increased opportunities for medical trainees to engage with people with IDD to improve resident physicians' comfort caring for this patient population.","PeriodicalId":273801,"journal":{"name":"Neurology: Education","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology: Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/ne9.0000000000200045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Individuals with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities (IDD) experience worse health outcomes compared with peers without a disability partly due to difficulties accessing age-appropriate health care. Provider discomfort with interacting and caring for individuals with IDD is a primary barrier to accessing care. The objectives of this study were to describe resident physicians' education, experiences, and comfort levels regarding individuals with IDD and to identify predictors of higher comfort levels with this patient population.In this cross-sectional study, we surveyed medical trainees in 7 residency programs in Boston, Massachusetts on their education, experiences, and comfort levels regarding individuals with IDD. The comfort level was assessed directly on a 6-point Likert scale. The relationship between comfort regarding people with IDD and several candidate explanatory variables was explored with Spearman and partial Spearman correlations (rs).The estimated survey response rate was 49%. Of 423 resident physicians included in the study, 96% reported they had treated a patient with IDD, while only 25% reported having formal education on caring for this population. On a scale of 1–6, with higher numbers corresponding to greater comfort, the mean comfort level treating individuals with IDD was 3.73 (CI 3.61–3.85). In bivariant analyses, the amount of prior experience with people with IDD had a moderate, positive correlation with increased comfort levels treating individuals with IDD (rs= 0.42,p< 0.01). The following characteristics had a weak, positive correlation with increased comfort levels: training in a pediatric-focused residency specialty (rs= 0.18,p< 0.01), number of hours of formal education on caring for people with IDD (rs= 0.15,p< 0.01), and age (rs= 0.12,p= 0.03). Only the amount of prior experience with this patient population remained positively correlated with higher comfort levels when the other variables were controlled for (rs= 0.38,p< 0.01).Prior experience with individuals with IDD predicted higher comfort levels with this population. This study supports the need for increased opportunities for medical trainees to engage with people with IDD to improve resident physicians' comfort caring for this patient population.
教育研究:住院医师对智力和发育障碍患者的安慰预测因素
与没有残疾的同龄人相比,患有智力和/或发育残疾的个人的健康状况更差,部分原因是难以获得与年龄相适应的卫生保健。提供者在与缺碘症患者互动和护理时感到不适是获得护理的主要障碍。本研究的目的是描述住院医师对IDD患者的教育程度、经验和舒适度,并确定该患者群体舒适度较高的预测因素。在这项横断面研究中,我们调查了马萨诸塞州波士顿7个住院医师项目的医学实习生,调查了他们对IDD患者的教育、经历和舒适度。舒适度是直接用6分李克特量表评估的。通过Spearman和部分Spearman相关(rs)探讨了IDD患者的舒适度与几个候选解释变量之间的关系。估计调查回复率为49%。在纳入研究的423名住院医师中,96%的人报告说他们治疗过IDD患者,而只有25%的人报告说他们接受过护理这一人群的正规教育。在1-6的量表上,数值越高,舒适度越高,IDD患者的平均舒适度为3.73 (CI 3.61-3.85)。在双变量分析中,治疗IDD患者的经验与治疗IDD患者舒适度的增加有中度正相关(rs= 0.42,p< 0.01)。以下特征与舒适度的提高呈弱正相关:儿科住院医师专业培训(rs= 0.18,p< 0.01)、IDD患者护理的正规教育时数(rs= 0.15,p< 0.01)和年龄(rs= 0.12,p= 0.03)。当控制其他变量时,只有该患者群体的既往经验量与较高的舒适度保持正相关(rs= 0.38,p< 0.01)。先前与IDD患者接触的经验表明,这一人群的舒适度更高。本研究支持有必要增加医疗培训生与IDD患者接触的机会,以提高住院医师照顾这一患者群体的舒适度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信