MODERN DECISION-MAKING MECHANISM IN THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL FARMS

Reka Korhec, O. Sedlak, Aleksandra Marcikić Horvat, D. Stojić, B. Radovanov, Mirjana Marić
{"title":"MODERN DECISION-MAKING MECHANISM IN THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT OF SMALL FARMS","authors":"Reka Korhec, O. Sedlak, Aleksandra Marcikić Horvat, D. Stojić, B. Radovanov, Mirjana Marić","doi":"10.59267/ekopolj2302437k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods can contribute to finding the most rational solution more easily and efficiently. The purpose of the research is to investigate the applicability of the PROMETHEE and TOPSIS methods at the level of family farms and their comparative analysis in the case of the purchase of agricultural mechanization. Both methods start from a set of criteria established based on the subjective expectations of 48 farmers (decision makers) who were asked to choose the decision criteria. Then, mathematical models are used to determine the most suitable choice for the farm. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that applying both methods in parallel leads to similar outcomes. Although decision support systems can be instrumental in making the right decisions, their usage is still not widely adopted in family farms due to the challenges of introducing new solutions in a production setting.","PeriodicalId":201477,"journal":{"name":"Ekonomika poljoprivrede","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ekonomika poljoprivrede","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59267/ekopolj2302437k","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods can contribute to finding the most rational solution more easily and efficiently. The purpose of the research is to investigate the applicability of the PROMETHEE and TOPSIS methods at the level of family farms and their comparative analysis in the case of the purchase of agricultural mechanization. Both methods start from a set of criteria established based on the subjective expectations of 48 farmers (decision makers) who were asked to choose the decision criteria. Then, mathematical models are used to determine the most suitable choice for the farm. Based on the research findings, it can be concluded that applying both methods in parallel leads to similar outcomes. Although decision support systems can be instrumental in making the right decisions, their usage is still not widely adopted in family farms due to the challenges of introducing new solutions in a production setting.
小农场发展过程中的现代决策机制
采用多准则决策方法可以更容易、更有效地找到最合理的解决方案。本研究的目的是探讨PROMETHEE和TOPSIS方法在家庭农场层面的适用性,并在农机化购买的情况下进行比较分析。这两种方法都是从一组标准开始的,这些标准是根据48名农民(决策者)的主观期望建立的,他们被要求选择决策标准。然后,使用数学模型来确定最适合农场的选择。根据研究结果,可以得出结论,两种方法并行应用会导致相似的结果。尽管决策支持系统可以帮助做出正确的决策,但由于在生产环境中引入新解决方案的挑战,它们的使用仍未在家庭农场得到广泛采用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信