A review and comparison of rule languages and rule-based inference engines for the Semantic Web

Thanyalak Rattanasawad, K. Saikaew, M. Buranarach, T. Supnithi
{"title":"A review and comparison of rule languages and rule-based inference engines for the Semantic Web","authors":"Thanyalak Rattanasawad, K. Saikaew, M. Buranarach, T. Supnithi","doi":"10.1109/ICSEC.2013.6694743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the Semantic Web data standards defined, more applications demand inference engines in providing support for intelligent processing of the Semantic Web data. Rule-based inference engines or rule-based reasoners are used in many domains such as supporting clinical decision support system, e-commerce recommender system, access control mechanism. In order to allow rule reuse and interoperation, several rule languages have been designed for the Web. In this paper, we review and compare some rule languages designed for the Web including FOL-RuleML, SWRL, Notation3, Jena rules and RIF. Some of the comparison criteria include rule expressiveness, syntax, production operations, and built-in functions. In addition, we review and compare some free and public domain rule-based reasoners including Jena inference engine, EYE, OWLIM-lite, BaseVISor and FuXi. Some of the comparison criteria include inference algorithms, supported programming languages, RDFS/OWL reasoning, rule languages and functions. The review and comparison results will provide some guideline for researchers and developers in choosing the rule languages and systems that match the application requirements.","PeriodicalId":191620,"journal":{"name":"2013 International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 International Computer Science and Engineering Conference (ICSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSEC.2013.6694743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

With the Semantic Web data standards defined, more applications demand inference engines in providing support for intelligent processing of the Semantic Web data. Rule-based inference engines or rule-based reasoners are used in many domains such as supporting clinical decision support system, e-commerce recommender system, access control mechanism. In order to allow rule reuse and interoperation, several rule languages have been designed for the Web. In this paper, we review and compare some rule languages designed for the Web including FOL-RuleML, SWRL, Notation3, Jena rules and RIF. Some of the comparison criteria include rule expressiveness, syntax, production operations, and built-in functions. In addition, we review and compare some free and public domain rule-based reasoners including Jena inference engine, EYE, OWLIM-lite, BaseVISor and FuXi. Some of the comparison criteria include inference algorithms, supported programming languages, RDFS/OWL reasoning, rule languages and functions. The review and comparison results will provide some guideline for researchers and developers in choosing the rule languages and systems that match the application requirements.
语义网的规则语言和基于规则的推理引擎的回顾和比较
随着语义Web数据标准的定义,越来越多的应用需要推理引擎为语义Web数据的智能处理提供支持。基于规则的推理引擎或基于规则的推理机被用于支持临床决策支持系统、电子商务推荐系统、访问控制机制等许多领域。为了允许规则重用和互操作,已经为Web设计了几种规则语言。本文回顾和比较了一些为Web设计的规则语言,包括foll - ruleml、SWRL、Notation3、Jena规则和RIF。一些比较标准包括规则表达性、语法、生产操作和内置函数。此外,我们还回顾和比较了一些免费的和公共领域的基于规则的推理器,包括Jena推理引擎、EYE、owlin -lite、BaseVISor和FuXi。一些比较标准包括推理算法、支持的编程语言、RDFS/OWL推理、规则语言和函数。评审和比较结果将为研究人员和开发人员选择符合应用需求的规则语言和系统提供一些指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信