Gerenciamento de Projetos: Comparativo Bibliométrico dos Anais de Congressos Brasileiros na Área de Administração e Engenharia de Produção

Ronielton Rezende Oliveira, Patricia Souza Amaral Tardivo Boldorini, H. C. Martins, A. T. Dias
{"title":"Gerenciamento de Projetos: Comparativo Bibliométrico dos Anais de Congressos Brasileiros na Área de Administração e Engenharia de Produção","authors":"Ronielton Rezende Oliveira, Patricia Souza Amaral Tardivo Boldorini, H. C. Martins, A. T. Dias","doi":"10.5585/GEP.V7I1.377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examined the scientific production on the subject of Project Management from period 2004 to 2014. The unit of analysis is composed of articles published in the Brazilian annals of the Meeting of the National Association of Graduate Studies and Research in Administration (EnANPAD) and the Meeting of the National Production Engineering (ENEGEP) in the last 11 years. The results show that the theoretical focus is in the discussion of how the fundamentals of project management are used by practitioners, because of the sub-theme of greatest interest identified in this study was the ‘Application of Practices’, followed by the sub-theme ‘Tools and Techniques’. The paper also points out that the research agenda has Brazilian researchers regularly and frequently in the theme, which depict the project management function of typical and unique variables in Brazil. Depending on the most cited references in the articles analyzed, confirms the importance of the journals referenced in accordance with the classification CAPES WebQualis and presence in SCOPUS Journal Metrics database with the indices Impact per Publication (IPP) and SCImago Journal Rank (JRS). Finally, it appears that there is little interest in project management studies by Brazilian researchers.","PeriodicalId":285072,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Gestão e Projetos","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Gestão e Projetos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5585/GEP.V7I1.377","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examined the scientific production on the subject of Project Management from period 2004 to 2014. The unit of analysis is composed of articles published in the Brazilian annals of the Meeting of the National Association of Graduate Studies and Research in Administration (EnANPAD) and the Meeting of the National Production Engineering (ENEGEP) in the last 11 years. The results show that the theoretical focus is in the discussion of how the fundamentals of project management are used by practitioners, because of the sub-theme of greatest interest identified in this study was the ‘Application of Practices’, followed by the sub-theme ‘Tools and Techniques’. The paper also points out that the research agenda has Brazilian researchers regularly and frequently in the theme, which depict the project management function of typical and unique variables in Brazil. Depending on the most cited references in the articles analyzed, confirms the importance of the journals referenced in accordance with the classification CAPES WebQualis and presence in SCOPUS Journal Metrics database with the indices Impact per Publication (IPP) and SCImago Journal Rank (JRS). Finally, it appears that there is little interest in project management studies by Brazilian researchers.
项目管理:管理和生产工程领域巴西会议记录的文献计量比较
本文考察了2004 - 2014年《项目管理》课题的科研成果。分析单位是由过去11年来在巴西全国行政研究生研究协会(EnANPAD)会议和全国生产工程会议(ENEGEP)上发表的文章组成的。结果表明,理论重点是讨论项目管理的基本原理如何被实践者使用,因为在本研究中确定的最感兴趣的子主题是“实践的应用”,其次是子主题“工具和技术”。论文还指出,研究议程中有巴西研究人员定期和频繁地出现在主题中,描绘了巴西典型和独特变量的项目管理功能。根据文章中被引用最多的参考文献,根据CAPES WebQualis分类和SCOPUS Journal Metrics数据库(IPP)和SCImago Journal Rank (JRS)指数,确认了被引用期刊的重要性。最后,巴西研究人员似乎对项目管理研究兴趣不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信