A comparison of existing coordinate transformation models and parameters in Australia

W. Featherstone
{"title":"A comparison of existing coordinate transformation models and parameters in Australia","authors":"W. Featherstone","doi":"10.1080/00690805.1997.9714042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editor's note: This paper is a joint publication by the Institution of Surveyors, Australia and the Mapping Sciences Institute, Australia. Four standard procedures to transform curvilinear co-ordinates from the Australian Geodetic Datum 1984 to the World Geodetic System 1984 are compared. These comprise the Bursa-Wolf model with the national set of seven parameters currently used by Federal and State surveying and mapping authorities, the standard Molodensky model with the five parameters used by the United States Defense Mapping Agency, the simple three-parameter model with the origin shifts taken from the Bursa-Wolf and standard Molodensky models, and the multiple regression equations as determined by the Defense Mapping Agency. The differences between the resulting co-ordinates can reach 4.2 metres over continental Australia, which has implications for the final approach adopted to transform to the Geocentric Datum of Australia. The arguments are presented in favour of more suitable transformation stra...","PeriodicalId":222452,"journal":{"name":"The Australian Surveyor","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Australian Surveyor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00690805.1997.9714042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Editor's note: This paper is a joint publication by the Institution of Surveyors, Australia and the Mapping Sciences Institute, Australia. Four standard procedures to transform curvilinear co-ordinates from the Australian Geodetic Datum 1984 to the World Geodetic System 1984 are compared. These comprise the Bursa-Wolf model with the national set of seven parameters currently used by Federal and State surveying and mapping authorities, the standard Molodensky model with the five parameters used by the United States Defense Mapping Agency, the simple three-parameter model with the origin shifts taken from the Bursa-Wolf and standard Molodensky models, and the multiple regression equations as determined by the Defense Mapping Agency. The differences between the resulting co-ordinates can reach 4.2 metres over continental Australia, which has implications for the final approach adopted to transform to the Geocentric Datum of Australia. The arguments are presented in favour of more suitable transformation stra...
澳大利亚现有坐标变换模型和参数的比较
编者注:本文由澳大利亚测量师学会和澳大利亚测绘科学研究所联合出版。比较了从1984年澳大利亚大地基准面到1984年世界大地测量系统的曲线坐标转换的四种标准程序。这些模型包括布尔萨-沃尔夫模型,其中包含联邦和州测绘当局目前使用的7个国家参数集;标准莫洛登斯基模型,其中包含美国国防测绘局使用的5个参数;简单的三参数模型,其原点偏移取自布尔萨-沃尔夫模型和标准莫洛登斯基模型;以及由国防测绘局确定的多元回归方程。所得到的坐标之间的差异在澳大利亚大陆上空可以达到4.2米,这对最终采用的转换为澳大利亚地心基准面的方法有影响。提出了支持更合适的转换策略的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信