On Electoral Processes in the Western Balkan Countries

A. Kume, Linert Lireza
{"title":"On Electoral Processes in the Western Balkan Countries","authors":"A. Kume, Linert Lireza","doi":"10.56345/ijrdv9n409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the results of the comparative analysis on the level of meeting the standards in the electoral processes held in the countries of the Western Balkans. The analysis is based on the evaluations published for the Election Integrity Perception Index, for elections held in the period 2011-2021. Montenegro, Serbia, Albania and Kosovo are classified in countries that belong to the \"Moderate\" category in helding elections according to the requirements of democratic standards. BiH, North Macedonia are classified at the level \"Very low\" and \"Low\", respectively. The election campaign and its financing is the main challenge faced by all the countries of the Western Balkans. Except for Albania, which is classified in the group of countries with a \"moderate\" level, the perception of the role of the media in the election campaign in other countries of the Western Balkans is negative, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Serbia \"Very low\", BiH and Montenegro \"Low\" . All the countries of this region, in particular BiH, North Macedonia and Serbia, should be committed to improve the electoral legislation and the list of voters. Among the countries of this region, there are significant differences in relation to the quality of administration of electoral processes by electoral authorities. \n  \nReceived: 6 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 November 2022 / Published: 18 November 2022","PeriodicalId":136623,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary Journal of Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56345/ijrdv9n409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents the results of the comparative analysis on the level of meeting the standards in the electoral processes held in the countries of the Western Balkans. The analysis is based on the evaluations published for the Election Integrity Perception Index, for elections held in the period 2011-2021. Montenegro, Serbia, Albania and Kosovo are classified in countries that belong to the "Moderate" category in helding elections according to the requirements of democratic standards. BiH, North Macedonia are classified at the level "Very low" and "Low", respectively. The election campaign and its financing is the main challenge faced by all the countries of the Western Balkans. Except for Albania, which is classified in the group of countries with a "moderate" level, the perception of the role of the media in the election campaign in other countries of the Western Balkans is negative, Kosovo, North Macedonia and Serbia "Very low", BiH and Montenegro "Low" . All the countries of this region, in particular BiH, North Macedonia and Serbia, should be committed to improve the electoral legislation and the list of voters. Among the countries of this region, there are significant differences in relation to the quality of administration of electoral processes by electoral authorities.   Received: 6 October 2022 / Accepted: 12 November 2022 / Published: 18 November 2022
西巴尔干国家的选举进程
本文介绍了对在西巴尔干国家举行的选举过程中达到标准的程度进行比较分析的结果。该分析是根据2011年至2021年期间举行的选举廉正感知指数(Election Integrity Perception Index)发表的评价结果进行的。黑山、塞尔维亚、阿尔巴尼亚和科索沃按照民主标准的要求,在举行选举方面属于“温和”类别的国家。波黑和北马其顿分别被列为“非常低”和“低”级别。竞选活动及其筹资是西巴尔干所有国家面临的主要挑战。除了阿尔巴尼亚被列为“中等”水平的国家外,西巴尔干其他国家对媒体在竞选活动中的作用的看法是消极的,科索沃、北马其顿和塞尔维亚“很低”,波黑和黑山“低”。本区域所有国家,特别是波黑、北马其顿和塞尔维亚,应致力于改进选举立法和选民名单。本区域各国在选举当局管理选举过程的质量方面有很大的差别。收稿日期:2022年10月6日/收稿日期:2022年11月12日/发表日期:2022年11月18日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信