Rating-based Preference Elicitation for Recommendation of Stress Intervention

Helma Torkamaan, J. Ziegler
{"title":"Rating-based Preference Elicitation for Recommendation of Stress Intervention","authors":"Helma Torkamaan, J. Ziegler","doi":"10.1145/3320435.3324990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, recommender systems have emerged as a key component for personalization in health applications. Central in the development of recommender systems is rating-based preference elicitation, based both on single-criterion and multi-criteria rating. Though its use has already been studied in various domains of recommender systems, far too little attention has been paid to preference elicitation in health recommender systems~(HRS). The purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding of this preference elicitation by studying the criteria that users consider when they rate a health promotion recommendation from HRS, and accordingly, to offer a design solution as a functional feedback model for mobile health applications. This paper investigates the user-perceived importance of various criteria, as well as latent factors for eliciting user feedback on the recommendations. It also reports the relationship of explanation and trust to the overall rating. By aggregating a list of all possible criteria, we further discover that not all criteria are equally important to users, and that the effectiveness of a recommendation plays a dominant role.","PeriodicalId":254537,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 27th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3320435.3324990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In recent years, recommender systems have emerged as a key component for personalization in health applications. Central in the development of recommender systems is rating-based preference elicitation, based both on single-criterion and multi-criteria rating. Though its use has already been studied in various domains of recommender systems, far too little attention has been paid to preference elicitation in health recommender systems~(HRS). The purpose of this paper is to develop a better understanding of this preference elicitation by studying the criteria that users consider when they rate a health promotion recommendation from HRS, and accordingly, to offer a design solution as a functional feedback model for mobile health applications. This paper investigates the user-perceived importance of various criteria, as well as latent factors for eliciting user feedback on the recommendations. It also reports the relationship of explanation and trust to the overall rating. By aggregating a list of all possible criteria, we further discover that not all criteria are equally important to users, and that the effectiveness of a recommendation plays a dominant role.
基于评分的压力干预推荐偏好启发
近年来,推荐系统已成为个性化医疗应用的关键组成部分。推荐系统开发的核心是基于单标准和多标准评级的基于评级的偏好激发。虽然在推荐系统的各个领域已经对其使用进行了研究,但在健康推荐系统(HRS)中对偏好激发的关注太少了。本文的目的是通过研究用户在评价HRS的健康促进推荐时考虑的标准,更好地理解这种偏好激发,并相应地提供一个设计解决方案,作为移动健康应用程序的功能反馈模型。本文研究了用户感知到的各种标准的重要性,以及引发用户对推荐反馈的潜在因素。它还报告了解释和信任对整体评级的关系。通过汇总所有可能的标准列表,我们进一步发现并不是所有的标准对用户都同等重要,推荐的有效性起着主导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信