Objective comparison of digital flat-panel radiography detectors

V. Ostojic, Djordje Starcevic, V. Petrovic
{"title":"Objective comparison of digital flat-panel radiography detectors","authors":"V. Ostojic, Djordje Starcevic, V. Petrovic","doi":"10.1109/INDEL.2016.7797796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital flat-panel radiography detectors have become a standard part of modern digital radiography systems. Performance of a detector can be evaluated through three major indicators: noise, contrast and spatial resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio was employed to evaluate noise presence, contrast-to-noise ratio was utilized for contrast characteristic estimate while modulation transfer function and visual inspection of resolution phantom image were used for spatial resolution evaluation. In this paper, we present an extensive comparison of eight different flat-panel detectors using aforementioned evaluation methods. Comparison results are presented both numerically and graphically.","PeriodicalId":273613,"journal":{"name":"2016 International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (INDEL)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (INDEL)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INDEL.2016.7797796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital flat-panel radiography detectors have become a standard part of modern digital radiography systems. Performance of a detector can be evaluated through three major indicators: noise, contrast and spatial resolution. Signal-to-noise ratio was employed to evaluate noise presence, contrast-to-noise ratio was utilized for contrast characteristic estimate while modulation transfer function and visual inspection of resolution phantom image were used for spatial resolution evaluation. In this paper, we present an extensive comparison of eight different flat-panel detectors using aforementioned evaluation methods. Comparison results are presented both numerically and graphically.
目的比较数字平板x线摄影检波器
数字平板射线照相探测器已成为现代数字射线照相系统的标准组成部分。检测器的性能可以通过三个主要指标来评估:噪声、对比度和空间分辨率。采用信噪比评价噪声存在,对比噪比评价对比度特性,采用调制传递函数和分辨率幻影图像视觉检测评价空间分辨率。在本文中,我们使用上述评估方法对八种不同的平板探测器进行了广泛的比较。对比结果以数值和图形两种形式给出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信