COMPARISON OF SETTINGS REGARDING THE DEAD INJECTION APPLICATION IN THE NETHERLANDS AND INDONESIAN COUNTRIES

Desak Paramita Brata
{"title":"COMPARISON OF SETTINGS REGARDING THE DEAD INJECTION APPLICATION IN THE NETHERLANDS AND INDONESIAN COUNTRIES","authors":"Desak Paramita Brata","doi":"10.23887/glr.v2i1.119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nCountries around the world have different legal systems. But the most commonly known are the Continental European legal system and the Anglo Saxon legal system. Continental European legal system is a legal system based on various legal provisions that have been codified and the example of the State that has this system is the State of Indonesia. Whereas Anglo Saxon is a legal system based on jurisprudence and the example of the State which has this system is the Netherlands. Each country has a different legal system, as well as in medicine. In the medical world known as Euthanasia. Euthanasia is defined as the act of terminating a person's life (or other creatures) on purpose because of the pain that makes him suffer too much. Indonesia has not specifically and firmly set the issue of Euthanasia and this matter is still being debated. The Indonesian Criminal Code does not find any articles that explicitly regulate eutahanasia. However, if observed, there is an article which shows that the prohibition against Euthanasia is article 344 of the Criminal Code, which is a murder carried out with a very and strict request by the victim. It is different from other Continental European countries such as the Netherlands as the first country to legalize Euthanasia. As of 2002, the Netherlands has adopted the concept of Euthanasia into its legal book. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":399663,"journal":{"name":"Ganesha Law Review","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ganesha Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v2i1.119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Countries around the world have different legal systems. But the most commonly known are the Continental European legal system and the Anglo Saxon legal system. Continental European legal system is a legal system based on various legal provisions that have been codified and the example of the State that has this system is the State of Indonesia. Whereas Anglo Saxon is a legal system based on jurisprudence and the example of the State which has this system is the Netherlands. Each country has a different legal system, as well as in medicine. In the medical world known as Euthanasia. Euthanasia is defined as the act of terminating a person's life (or other creatures) on purpose because of the pain that makes him suffer too much. Indonesia has not specifically and firmly set the issue of Euthanasia and this matter is still being debated. The Indonesian Criminal Code does not find any articles that explicitly regulate eutahanasia. However, if observed, there is an article which shows that the prohibition against Euthanasia is article 344 of the Criminal Code, which is a murder carried out with a very and strict request by the victim. It is different from other Continental European countries such as the Netherlands as the first country to legalize Euthanasia. As of 2002, the Netherlands has adopted the concept of Euthanasia into its legal book.
荷兰与印尼国家死刑注射制度之比较
世界各国有不同的法律制度。但最广为人知的是欧洲大陆法律体系和盎格鲁-撒克逊法律体系。欧洲大陆的法律制度是一种建立在已编纂的各种法律规定基础上的法律制度,拥有这一制度的国家的例子是印度尼西亚。而盎格鲁-撒克逊是一种基于法理学的法律体系拥有这种体系的国家的例子是荷兰。每个国家都有不同的法律体系,在医学上也是如此。在医学界被称为安乐死。安乐死被定义为故意终止一个人(或其他生物)生命的行为,因为他承受了太多的痛苦。印尼并没有明确和坚定地提出安乐死的问题,这个问题仍在辩论中。印尼《刑法》中没有明确规定安乐死的条款。然而,如果观察到,有一条表明禁止安乐死是刑法第344条,这是在受害者非常严格的要求下进行的谋杀。这与荷兰等最早将安乐死合法化的欧洲大陆国家不同。截至2002年,荷兰已将安乐死的概念纳入其法律书籍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信