Performance of Various Estimators for Censored Response Models with Endogenous Regressors

Changhui Kang, Myoung-jae Lee
{"title":"Performance of Various Estimators for Censored Response Models with Endogenous Regressors","authors":"Changhui Kang, Myoung-jae Lee","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-0106.2009.00463.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper reviews four approaches (substitution (SUB), control function (CF), system reduced form (SRF) and artificial instrumental regressor (AIR)) dealing with endogenous regressors in censored response models, and compares them through a simulation. Based on mean-squared-error type criteria, CF and AIR perform better than SUB and SRF; in terms of computation, however, SUB and CF are the easiest, closely followed by SRF. Although CF does well in both accounts, its assumptions are restrictive, and CF provides very different results from the other estimators when a real data set is used. Therefore, although the choice of an estimator among the four should be case-specific, for practitioners, we would recommend SUB.","PeriodicalId":134313,"journal":{"name":"Wiley-Blackwell: Pacific Economic Review","volume":"13 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiley-Blackwell: Pacific Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0106.2009.00463.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The paper reviews four approaches (substitution (SUB), control function (CF), system reduced form (SRF) and artificial instrumental regressor (AIR)) dealing with endogenous regressors in censored response models, and compares them through a simulation. Based on mean-squared-error type criteria, CF and AIR perform better than SUB and SRF; in terms of computation, however, SUB and CF are the easiest, closely followed by SRF. Although CF does well in both accounts, its assumptions are restrictive, and CF provides very different results from the other estimators when a real data set is used. Therefore, although the choice of an estimator among the four should be case-specific, for practitioners, we would recommend SUB.
含内生回归量的截尾响应模型的各种估计器的性能
本文综述了四种处理截尾响应模型中内生回归量的方法(替代(SUB)、控制函数(CF)、系统简化形式(SRF)和人工工具回归(AIR)),并通过仿真对它们进行了比较。基于均方误差类型准则,CF和AIR优于SUB和SRF;然而,在计算方面,SUB和CF是最简单的,其次是SRF。虽然CF在这两种情况下都做得很好,但它的假设是限制性的,当使用真实数据集时,CF提供的结果与其他估计器非常不同。因此,尽管在四个评估器中选择一个评估器应该是具体的,但是对于从业者来说,我们会推荐SUB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信