Comparison of QoS performance between IPv6 QoS management model and IntServ and DiffServ QoS models

E. Fgee, J. D. Kenney, W. Phillips, W. Robertson, S. Sivakumar
{"title":"Comparison of QoS performance between IPv6 QoS management model and IntServ and DiffServ QoS models","authors":"E. Fgee, J. D. Kenney, W. Phillips, W. Robertson, S. Sivakumar","doi":"10.1109/CNSR.2005.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.","PeriodicalId":166700,"journal":{"name":"3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference (CNSR'05)","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3rd Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference (CNSR'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CNSR.2005.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

An increasing number of emerging Internet applications require better than best effort quality of service (QoS) that is offered by the current Internet. Applications such as voice over IP (VoIP), video on demand (VoD) and e-commerce applications need end-to-end QoS guarantees defined in terms of throughput, delay and loss rate E. Kumsierek et al., (2002). However, QoS guarantee for these services require adding QoS algorithms that perform a number of resource management functions such as admission control, resource reservation and traffic monitoring. These functions can significantly increase the complexity and affect the scalability of the network. In this paper, three QoS schemes, integrated services (IntServ) P.P White (1997), differentiated services (DiffServ) S.Balck et al., (1998) and IPv6 QoS management, are compared with respect to QoS guarantee requirements. Also, the scalability and complexity issues are discussed for each one of them. The IPv6 QoS management model performs well during the simulation. It is also simple and scalable when it is implemented.
IPv6 QoS管理模型与IntServ和DiffServ QoS模型的QoS性能比较
越来越多的新兴Internet应用程序需要比当前Internet提供的最佳服务质量(QoS)更好的服务质量。诸如IP语音(VoIP)、视频点播(VoD)和电子商务应用等应用需要根据吞吐量、延迟和损失率定义的端到端QoS保证。E. Kumsierek等人,(2002)。但是,为了保证这些服务的QoS,需要增加QoS算法,这些算法可以实现准入控制、资源预留和流量监控等多种资源管理功能。这些功能会显著增加网络的复杂性,影响网络的可扩展性。本文就QoS保证要求对三种QoS方案进行了比较,即综合服务(IntServ) p.p. White(1997)、差异化服务(DiffServ) S.Balck等(1998)和IPv6 QoS管理。此外,还讨论了每种方法的可伸缩性和复杂性问题。IPv6 QoS管理模型在仿真过程中表现良好。它在实现时也很简单且可扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信