Conclusion

John H. Evans
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"John H. Evans","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197519561.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The conclusion begins by summarizing the history of barriers on the slippery slope of the human gene editing debate. A number of more meta-issues that the overall analysis has raised are discussed. First, the chapter analyses whether any barrier can hold in this debate, or whether what is allowable will slide down the slope as our technological abilities grow. The second issue is whether a barrier could be anchored in expertise and authority, instead of rules. This may be possible outside of the United States. Third, the reader is reminded that there is a group of participants in the debate who do not see a slide toward dystopia but a climb to a utopian future. Finally, the chapter discusses generalizations about barriers on slippery slopes that could be applied to other debates.","PeriodicalId":357537,"journal":{"name":"The Human Gene Editing Debate","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Human Gene Editing Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197519561.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The conclusion begins by summarizing the history of barriers on the slippery slope of the human gene editing debate. A number of more meta-issues that the overall analysis has raised are discussed. First, the chapter analyses whether any barrier can hold in this debate, or whether what is allowable will slide down the slope as our technological abilities grow. The second issue is whether a barrier could be anchored in expertise and authority, instead of rules. This may be possible outside of the United States. Third, the reader is reminded that there is a group of participants in the debate who do not see a slide toward dystopia but a climb to a utopian future. Finally, the chapter discusses generalizations about barriers on slippery slopes that could be applied to other debates.
结论
结论首先总结了人类基因编辑争论的滑坡障碍的历史。本文还讨论了整体分析中提出的一些元问题。首先,本章分析了在这场辩论中是否存在任何障碍,或者随着我们技术能力的增长,允许的障碍是否会走下坡路。第二个问题是,障碍是否可以建立在专业知识和权威之上,而不是建立在规则之上。这在美国以外也可能实现。第三,我们提醒读者,在这场辩论中,有一群参与者并不认为这是在滑向反乌托邦,而是在攀登乌托邦的未来。最后,本章讨论了可以应用于其他辩论的关于滑坡障碍的概括。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信