Effect of Transparency and Trust on Acceptance of Automatic Online Comment Moderation Systems

Jens Brunk, J. Mattern, Dennis M. Riehle
{"title":"Effect of Transparency and Trust on Acceptance of Automatic Online Comment Moderation Systems","authors":"Jens Brunk, J. Mattern, Dennis M. Riehle","doi":"10.1109/CBI.2019.00056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User-generated online comments and posts increasingly contain abusive content that needs moderation from an ethical but also legislative perspective. The amount of comments and the need for moderation in our digital world often overpower the capacity of manual moderation. To remedy this, platforms often adopt semi-automated moderation systems. However, because such systems are typically black boxes, user trust in and acceptance of the system is not easily achieved, as black box systems can be perceived as nontransparent and moderating user comments is easily associated with censorship. Therefore, we investigate the relationship of system transparency through explanations, user trust and system acceptance with an online experiment. Our results show that the transparency of an automatic online comment moderation system is a prerequisite for user trust in the system. However, the objective transparency of the moderation system does not influence the user's acceptance.","PeriodicalId":193238,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE 21st Conference on Business Informatics (CBI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CBI.2019.00056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

User-generated online comments and posts increasingly contain abusive content that needs moderation from an ethical but also legislative perspective. The amount of comments and the need for moderation in our digital world often overpower the capacity of manual moderation. To remedy this, platforms often adopt semi-automated moderation systems. However, because such systems are typically black boxes, user trust in and acceptance of the system is not easily achieved, as black box systems can be perceived as nontransparent and moderating user comments is easily associated with censorship. Therefore, we investigate the relationship of system transparency through explanations, user trust and system acceptance with an online experiment. Our results show that the transparency of an automatic online comment moderation system is a prerequisite for user trust in the system. However, the objective transparency of the moderation system does not influence the user's acceptance.
透明度和信任对在线评论自动审核系统接受度的影响
用户生成的在线评论和帖子越来越多地包含滥用内容,从道德和立法的角度来看,这些内容需要加以节制。在我们的数字世界里,评论的数量和对节制的需求往往超过了人工节制的能力。为了解决这个问题,平台通常采用半自动审核系统。然而,由于这样的系统通常是黑盒,用户对系统的信任和接受不容易实现,因为黑盒系统可以被认为是不透明的,并且用户评论的审核很容易与审查联系在一起。因此,我们通过一个在线实验来研究通过解释、用户信任和系统接受的系统透明度之间的关系。我们的研究结果表明,自动在线评论审核系统的透明度是用户信任系统的先决条件。然而,审核系统的客观透明度并不影响用户的接受程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信