Comparison of Physical and Chemical Composition of Leachate from Three Municipal Waste Landfills: Sarajevo, Zenica and Tuzla (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Case Study

Danijela Simeunčević, Sara Basta, Branislav Mihajlović
{"title":"Comparison of Physical and Chemical Composition of Leachate from Three Municipal Waste Landfills: Sarajevo, Zenica and Tuzla (Bosnia and Herzegovina) Case Study","authors":"Danijela Simeunčević, Sara Basta, Branislav Mihajlović","doi":"10.7251/qol2203089s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), waste management is still based on the preventive disposal of waste in landfills, of which most landfills are unregulated. According to World Bank reports, BiH must deal with the improvement of waste disposal to protect the environment. The aim of this study was to review the physical and chemical composition of leachate from municipal waste landfills. The following standard physicochemical methods were used: pH, total suspended solids (TSS), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD5), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), chlorides, and sulphates. The leachate quality test was conducted over three years at landfills in Sarajevo, Zenica and Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Based on the processed data (from the processed tables), and in comparison with the expected values of pollutants in landfills over the period of 10 years, we can conclude the following: (1) Landfill “Smiljevići” Sarajevo, in the observed period of 3 years, has a higher average value than expected; (2) Landfill “Desetina” Tuzla, in the observed period of 3 years, has a higher average value than expected; (3) Landfill “Mošćanica” Zenica, in the observed period of 3 years, has a higher average value than expected.","PeriodicalId":363723,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life (Banja Luka) - APEIRON","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life (Banja Luka) - APEIRON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7251/qol2203089s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH), waste management is still based on the preventive disposal of waste in landfills, of which most landfills are unregulated. According to World Bank reports, BiH must deal with the improvement of waste disposal to protect the environment. The aim of this study was to review the physical and chemical composition of leachate from municipal waste landfills. The following standard physicochemical methods were used: pH, total suspended solids (TSS), Biological Oxygen Demand (BOD5), Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), chlorides, and sulphates. The leachate quality test was conducted over three years at landfills in Sarajevo, Zenica and Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH). Based on the processed data (from the processed tables), and in comparison with the expected values of pollutants in landfills over the period of 10 years, we can conclude the following: (1) Landfill “Smiljevići” Sarajevo, in the observed period of 3 years, has a higher average value than expected; (2) Landfill “Desetina” Tuzla, in the observed period of 3 years, has a higher average value than expected; (3) Landfill “Mošćanica” Zenica, in the observed period of 3 years, has a higher average value than expected.
三个城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液的物理和化学成分比较:萨拉热窝、泽尼察和图兹拉(波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那)案例研究
在波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那(波黑),废物管理仍然以在垃圾填埋场预防性处置废物为基础,其中大多数垃圾填埋场是不受管制的。根据世界银行的报告,波黑必须改善废物处理以保护环境。本研究的目的是回顾城市垃圾填埋场渗滤液的物理和化学成分。使用了以下标准的物理化学方法:pH、总悬浮固体(TSS)、生物需氧量(BOD5)、化学需氧量(COD)、总氮(TN)、总磷(TP)、氯化物和硫酸盐。在波斯尼亚-黑塞哥维那(波黑)萨拉热窝、泽尼察和图兹拉的垃圾填埋场进行了三年的渗滤液质量测试。根据处理后的数据(来自处理后的表格),并与10年期间垃圾填埋场污染物的期望值进行比较,我们可以得出以下结论:(1)在3年的观测期内,“Smiljevići”萨拉热窝垃圾填埋场的平均值高于期望值;(2)图兹拉“Desetina”填埋场在3年的观测期内,其平均值高于预期值;(3)在3年的观测期内,“Mošćanica”Zenica填埋场的平均值高于预期值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信