Comparative analysis between ribbed slabs and steel deck slabs in construction civil works in the city of Manaus

J. D. C. Martins, J. Benevides, C. Brito, David Barbosa de Alencar, J. Júnior, Antônio Estanislau Sanches
{"title":"Comparative analysis between ribbed slabs and steel deck slabs in construction civil works in the city of Manaus","authors":"J. D. C. Martins, J. Benevides, C. Brito, David Barbosa de Alencar, J. Júnior, Antônio Estanislau Sanches","doi":"10.5935/2447-0228.20180099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article makes a comparative analysis of ribbed slabs and steel deck type, in works in the city of Manaus. The study was built from the comparative analysis method that seeks a causal inference, trying to define a comparative systematic illustration, that is, it seeks to verify the main attributes of a model and to compare it to another model by checking the advantages and disadvantages of one or the other. The choice of the theme was therefore motivated by the comparative analysis of the following points: the demand for more work in relation to the issue of slab production and execution; the ambiguity surrounding the discussions and proposals on the predominantly regional theme; and the need to evaluate the production and execution of the two (2) types of slabs (ribbed and steel deck type). the steel deck slabs have a lower cost than the ribbed slabs, corresponding to a 20.0% difference. However, for spans greater than 6.0 m, the relative cost of the steel deck slab increases significantly, reaching a difference of more than 70%.","PeriodicalId":236176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Technology for Industrial Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2447-0228.20180099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article makes a comparative analysis of ribbed slabs and steel deck type, in works in the city of Manaus. The study was built from the comparative analysis method that seeks a causal inference, trying to define a comparative systematic illustration, that is, it seeks to verify the main attributes of a model and to compare it to another model by checking the advantages and disadvantages of one or the other. The choice of the theme was therefore motivated by the comparative analysis of the following points: the demand for more work in relation to the issue of slab production and execution; the ambiguity surrounding the discussions and proposals on the predominantly regional theme; and the need to evaluate the production and execution of the two (2) types of slabs (ribbed and steel deck type). the steel deck slabs have a lower cost than the ribbed slabs, corresponding to a 20.0% difference. However, for spans greater than 6.0 m, the relative cost of the steel deck slab increases significantly, reaching a difference of more than 70%.
马瑙斯市建筑土建工程中肋板与钢板的对比分析
本文对马瑙斯市工程中肋板与钢板形式进行了对比分析。本研究建立在寻求因果推理的比较分析法基础上,试图定义一个比较系统的说明,即试图验证一个模型的主要属性,并通过检查一个或另一个模型的优缺点来将其与另一个模型进行比较。因此,选择主题的动机是对以下几点进行比较分析:与板坯生产和执行问题有关的更多工作的需求;围绕主要区域主题的讨论和建议的模糊性;并且需要评估两(2)种板(肋板型和钢板型)的生产和执行。钢甲板板的成本比肋板低,相差20.0%。然而,跨度大于6.0 m时,钢甲板板的相对成本显著增加,差异达到70%以上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信