Land Acquisition and Use in Nigeria: Implications for Sustainable Food and Livelihood Security

I. Oluwatayo, O. Timothy, Ayodeji O. Ojo
{"title":"Land Acquisition and Use in Nigeria: Implications for Sustainable Food and Livelihood Security","authors":"I. Oluwatayo, O. Timothy, Ayodeji O. Ojo","doi":"10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land acquisition and use remain a critical issue of great policy relevance in developing countries such as Nigeria. This study therefore examined land acquisition and use in Nigeria within the context of food and livelihood security. The chapter used secondary data obtained from the World Bank website, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and other sources. It was found that there are gender, location and income-group considerations in the allocation of land in Nigeria. While the urban land market is relatively more formal, the rural land market is informal and the transactions were not documented in most cases. The study found that bureaucratic bottlenecks, high cost of registering land and long registration procedures, and inconsistent policy regimes impede the development of land market in Nigeria. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended that the government should reduce and make the processes to be completed in registering lands in Nigeria easier. The Land Use Act 1978 should be amended to capture the prevailing realities around customary laws and informal markets. The government should reduce the cost of land registration in Nigeria. Multilateral organisations and government should co-create and co-finance innovative interventions to improve activities in the land market. are carried out in informal markets under customary laws with poor or lack of documentation, especially in rural Nigeria. The land market in Nigeria has evolved over the years from the precolonial era when land titles were in custody of family and community heads through colonial era and post-colonial era. The current framework undermines food security as farmers typically lack the access to land and as such cannot scale their subsistence farming or even present land as collateral for formal loans. This study identified bureaucratic bottlenecks, high cost of registration of land title, weak land markets and policy inconsistency as the challenges of land acquisition and use in Nigeria. Based on the findings of the study, the following are recommended:","PeriodicalId":270958,"journal":{"name":"Land Use - Assessing the Past, Envisioning the Future","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Land Use - Assessing the Past, Envisioning the Future","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/INTECHOPEN.79997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Land acquisition and use remain a critical issue of great policy relevance in developing countries such as Nigeria. This study therefore examined land acquisition and use in Nigeria within the context of food and livelihood security. The chapter used secondary data obtained from the World Bank website, National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) and other sources. It was found that there are gender, location and income-group considerations in the allocation of land in Nigeria. While the urban land market is relatively more formal, the rural land market is informal and the transactions were not documented in most cases. The study found that bureaucratic bottlenecks, high cost of registering land and long registration procedures, and inconsistent policy regimes impede the development of land market in Nigeria. Based on the findings of the study, it was recommended that the government should reduce and make the processes to be completed in registering lands in Nigeria easier. The Land Use Act 1978 should be amended to capture the prevailing realities around customary laws and informal markets. The government should reduce the cost of land registration in Nigeria. Multilateral organisations and government should co-create and co-finance innovative interventions to improve activities in the land market. are carried out in informal markets under customary laws with poor or lack of documentation, especially in rural Nigeria. The land market in Nigeria has evolved over the years from the precolonial era when land titles were in custody of family and community heads through colonial era and post-colonial era. The current framework undermines food security as farmers typically lack the access to land and as such cannot scale their subsistence farming or even present land as collateral for formal loans. This study identified bureaucratic bottlenecks, high cost of registration of land title, weak land markets and policy inconsistency as the challenges of land acquisition and use in Nigeria. Based on the findings of the study, the following are recommended:
尼日利亚的土地征用和利用:对可持续粮食和生计安全的影响
在尼日利亚等发展中国家,土地征用和使用仍然是一个具有重大政策意义的关键问题。因此,本研究在粮食和生计安全的背景下审查了尼日利亚的土地征用和使用情况。本章使用了从世界银行网站、国家统计局(NBS)和其他来源获得的二手数据。调查发现,尼日利亚在分配土地时考虑到性别、地点和收入群体。城市土地市场相对来说比较正式,而农村土地市场则是非正式的,大多数情况下交易都没有记录。该研究发现,官僚主义瓶颈、高成本的土地注册和冗长的注册程序以及不一致的政策制度阻碍了尼日利亚土地市场的发展。根据这项研究的结果,有人建议政府应该减少并简化尼日利亚土地登记过程。应修订1978年的《土地使用法》,以适应习惯法和非正规市场的普遍现实。政府应该降低尼日利亚土地注册的成本。多边组织和政府应该共同创造和共同资助创新干预措施,以改善土地市场的活动。是根据习惯法在非正式市场进行的,缺乏或缺乏文件,特别是在尼日利亚农村。尼日利亚的土地市场多年来一直在发展,从前殖民时代开始,土地所有权由家庭和社区负责人保管,到殖民时代和后殖民时代。目前的框架破坏了粮食安全,因为农民通常无法获得土地,因此无法扩大自给农业的规模,甚至无法将土地作为正式贷款的抵押品。这项研究确定了官僚主义瓶颈、土地所有权登记成本高、土地市场疲软和政策不一致是尼日利亚土地征用和使用面临的挑战。根据研究结果,建议如下:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信