PUBLIC ASPECTS OF LOBBYING

Valentina F. Levicheva
{"title":"PUBLIC ASPECTS OF LOBBYING","authors":"Valentina F. Levicheva","doi":"10.28995/2073-6401-2021-4-61-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article analyzes the promotion of public interests as a pro- cess of interaction and competition between various groups and organizations (NGOs, social movements, professional associations, etc.) that convey social issues, expressing their concerns and seeking solutions from the authorities. The author calls into question the rather widespread point of view that any really serious flaw in the social structure of society becomes the topic of public discourse and gets the attention of the authorities. Reliance on the “fairness” of the public interest asserted does not exclude such phenomena as clientelism and favoritism. The author shows that there is not, and cannot be, any even nominal equidistance of public interest groups from the institutions of power, and lobbying efficiency depends on the resource, organizational, value and cul- tural factors. Special attention is paid to the analysis of correlation between the institutional and informal in lobbying public interests.","PeriodicalId":127301,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Philosophy. Social Studies. Art Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2073-6401-2021-4-61-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article analyzes the promotion of public interests as a pro- cess of interaction and competition between various groups and organizations (NGOs, social movements, professional associations, etc.) that convey social issues, expressing their concerns and seeking solutions from the authorities. The author calls into question the rather widespread point of view that any really serious flaw in the social structure of society becomes the topic of public discourse and gets the attention of the authorities. Reliance on the “fairness” of the public interest asserted does not exclude such phenomena as clientelism and favoritism. The author shows that there is not, and cannot be, any even nominal equidistance of public interest groups from the institutions of power, and lobbying efficiency depends on the resource, organizational, value and cul- tural factors. Special attention is paid to the analysis of correlation between the institutional and informal in lobbying public interests.
游说的公众层面
本文分析了公共利益的提升是各种团体和组织(非政府组织、社会运动、专业协会等)之间的互动和竞争过程,这些团体和组织传达社会问题,表达他们的关注,并向当局寻求解决方案。作者对一种相当普遍的观点提出了质疑,即社会结构中任何真正严重的缺陷都会成为公共话语的话题,并引起当局的注意。对所宣称的公共利益的“公平性”的依赖并不排除裙带关系和偏袒等现象。公共利益集团与权力机构之间不存在、也不可能存在名义上的等距,游说效率取决于资源、组织、价值和文化等因素。重点分析了制度游说与非正式游说在公共利益游说中的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信