{"title":"Usage of ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway with Low Cuff Pressure.","authors":"A. Ali, N. Turgut, I. O. Akinci","doi":"10.7727/wimj.2014.199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present article, we want to share our experience with usage of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with 45 cm H2O cuff pressure in twelve adult patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery under general anaesthesia. Laryngeal mask airway and developed models has been used as an alternative to endotracheal tube for many years in anaesthesia practice. Several studies indicated that LMA devices, including LMA ProSeal, caused lower haemodynamic responses during intubation and lower postoperative side effects compared to endotracheal tubes (1). Many studies indicate that reduction and monitorization of LMA intracuff pressure may lower the incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications (2). We used Proseal LMA (Number 5) with lower cuff pressure (45 cm H2O) than recommended (60 cm H2O) for twelve male adult patients. Patient characteristics are specified in the Table.","PeriodicalId":104133,"journal":{"name":"The West Indian medical journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The West Indian medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7727/wimj.2014.199","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the present article, we want to share our experience with usage of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) with 45 cm H2O cuff pressure in twelve adult patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery under general anaesthesia. Laryngeal mask airway and developed models has been used as an alternative to endotracheal tube for many years in anaesthesia practice. Several studies indicated that LMA devices, including LMA ProSeal, caused lower haemodynamic responses during intubation and lower postoperative side effects compared to endotracheal tubes (1). Many studies indicate that reduction and monitorization of LMA intracuff pressure may lower the incidence of postoperative pharyngolaryngeal complications (2). We used Proseal LMA (Number 5) with lower cuff pressure (45 cm H2O) than recommended (60 cm H2O) for twelve male adult patients. Patient characteristics are specified in the Table.
在这篇文章中,我们想分享我们的经验,使用ProSeal喉罩气道(LMA) 45厘米水袖压在12例成人腹股沟疝手术在全身麻醉下。多年来,在麻醉实践中,喉罩气道和开发模型已被用作气管内插管的替代方法。几项研究表明,与气管内插管相比,LMA器械,包括LMA ProSeal,在插管过程中引起的血流动力学反应更低,术后副作用也更低(1)。许多研究表明,降低和监测LMA的袖带压力可能会降低术后咽部并发症的发生率(2)。我们使用ProSeal LMA(5号),袖带压力(45 cm H2O)低于推荐的(60 cm H2O)。患者特征列于表中。