A Comparison Between the Tunneling Process and Mapping Schemes for IPv4/IPv6 Transition

2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops Pub Date : 2009-05-26 DOI:10.1109/WAINA.2009.209

Ra'ed AlJa'afreh, J. Mellor, I. Awan

{"title":"A Comparison Between the Tunneling Process and Mapping Schemes for IPv4/IPv6 Transition","authors":"Ra'ed AlJa'afreh, J. Mellor, I. Awan","doi":"10.1109/WAINA.2009.209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A number of transition mechanisms have been developed to support the interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6 during the time of migration from the existing IP version (IPv4) to the new IP version (IPv6). BDMS is one of the IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms that has been designed to enable IPv4-only hosts to communicate with IPv6-only hosts and vice versa; while DSTM has been designed to enable IPv6 hosts to communicate with IPv4-only hosts. In this paper, we present the impact of the mapping and translation processes of the BDMS transition mechanism compared with the tunneling process of the DSTM when a variety of traffic loads are used. Our simulation results show that the delay and throughput results of the BDMS are close to the results of the DSTM and direct-link connections when the number of connected nodes is small. This paper shows that the tunneling process in the DSTM has a significant impact on the performance evaluation metrics compared with the BDMS and direct-link connections when large traffic loads are used. All the simulation scenarios in this paper are performed using the OMNeT++ simulator platform.","PeriodicalId":159465,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WAINA.2009.209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 21

Abstract

A number of transition mechanisms have been developed to support the interoperability between IPv4 and IPv6 during the time of migration from the existing IP version (IPv4) to the new IP version (IPv6). BDMS is one of the IPv4/IPv6 transition mechanisms that has been designed to enable IPv4-only hosts to communicate with IPv6-only hosts and vice versa; while DSTM has been designed to enable IPv6 hosts to communicate with IPv4-only hosts. In this paper, we present the impact of the mapping and translation processes of the BDMS transition mechanism compared with the tunneling process of the DSTM when a variety of traffic loads are used. Our simulation results show that the delay and throughput results of the BDMS are close to the results of the DSTM and direct-link connections when the number of connected nodes is small. This paper shows that the tunneling process in the DSTM has a significant impact on the performance evaluation metrics compared with the BDMS and direct-link connections when large traffic loads are used. All the simulation scenarios in this paper are performed using the OMNeT++ simulator platform.

查看原文本刊更多论文

IPv4/IPv6转换隧道过程和映射方案的比较

在从现有IP版本(IPv4)迁移到新IP版本(IPv6)期间，已经开发了许多过渡机制来支持IPv4和IPv6之间的互操作性。BDMS是IPv4/IPv6转换机制之一，旨在使纯IPv4主机能够与纯IPv6主机通信，反之亦然;而DSTM被设计为使IPv6主机能够与ipv4主机通信。在本文中，我们比较了在使用各种流量负载时，BDMS转换机制的映射和转换过程与DSTM的隧道化过程的影响。仿真结果表明，当连接节点数量较少时，BDMS的延迟和吞吐量结果与DSTM和直连连接的结果接近。本文表明，在大流量负载下，与BDMS和直连连接相比，DSTM中的隧道过程对性能评估指标有显著影响。本文中所有的仿真场景都是在omnet++仿真平台上进行的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

2009 International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops

自引率

0.00%

发文量