Privacy policies of the largest privately held companies: a review and analysis of the forbes private 50

A. Peslak
{"title":"Privacy policies of the largest privately held companies: a review and analysis of the forbes private 50","authors":"A. Peslak","doi":"10.1145/1055973.1055997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study reviews the Internet privacy policies of the 50 largest privately held companies in the US as identified by Forbes magazine. The study builds on work of prior researchers who analyzed popular and random e-commerce websites. In this study, the websites of privately held firms were reviewed and analyzed for the inclusion of the Federal Trade Commission's Fair Information Practices as well as a series of other consumer-centered factors. A comparison was also made between the policies of largest US publicly traded companies and the privately held companies. Overall the study finds that privately held companies do not demonstrate consistency in following Fair Information Practices or consumer-centered Internet policies. Also, the 50 largest privately held companies are generally less likely to publicly reveal their policies relative to Fair Information Practices or consumer-centered policies than the 50 largest publicly held companies. This is due to a large extent to lack of any privacy policies for many privately held companies. If only those companies with privacy policies are analyzed, two factors show significant differences between public and private company privacy policies.","PeriodicalId":318957,"journal":{"name":"SIGMIS CPR '05","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGMIS CPR '05","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1055973.1055997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

This study reviews the Internet privacy policies of the 50 largest privately held companies in the US as identified by Forbes magazine. The study builds on work of prior researchers who analyzed popular and random e-commerce websites. In this study, the websites of privately held firms were reviewed and analyzed for the inclusion of the Federal Trade Commission's Fair Information Practices as well as a series of other consumer-centered factors. A comparison was also made between the policies of largest US publicly traded companies and the privately held companies. Overall the study finds that privately held companies do not demonstrate consistency in following Fair Information Practices or consumer-centered Internet policies. Also, the 50 largest privately held companies are generally less likely to publicly reveal their policies relative to Fair Information Practices or consumer-centered policies than the 50 largest publicly held companies. This is due to a large extent to lack of any privacy policies for many privately held companies. If only those companies with privacy policies are analyzed, two factors show significant differences between public and private company privacy policies.
最大的私有公司的隐私政策:福布斯50家私有公司的回顾与分析
本研究回顾了福布斯杂志评选出的美国最大的50家私营公司的互联网隐私政策。这项研究建立在先前研究人员分析流行和随机电子商务网站的工作基础上。在本研究中,对私营公司的网站进行了审查和分析,以纳入联邦贸易委员会的公平信息实践以及一系列其他以消费者为中心的因素。研究还对美国最大的上市公司和私营公司的政策进行了比较。总的来说,研究发现私营公司在遵循公平信息实践或以消费者为中心的互联网政策方面没有表现出一致性。此外,与50家最大的上市公司相比,50家最大的私营公司通常不太可能公开披露其与公平信息实践或以消费者为中心的政策有关的政策。这在很大程度上是由于许多私人控股公司缺乏任何隐私政策。如果只分析那些有隐私政策的公司,两个因素显示出上市公司和私营公司隐私政策的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信