A Study on the Improvement of the System for Improving the Effectiveness of Public Participation Policy Ideas : Using Borich's Demand Map

소정 이, 현경 유, 지경 민, 정민 남
{"title":"A Study on the Improvement of the System for Improving the Effectiveness of Public Participation Policy Ideas : Using Borich's Demand Map","authors":"소정 이, 현경 유, 지경 민, 정민 남","doi":"10.48206/kceba.2022.6.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we entered the VUCA era, problems became more diverse and complex, and it became difficult for governments and companies to solve problems with only a small number of ideas in the organization. Accordingly, the importance of public participation using cooperative governance and collective intelligence is increasing. The government has made public participation a key value of \"government innovation\" by announcing the \"comprehensive government innovation promotion plan,\" and is expanding public participation opportunities by running programs to support public creative activities so that public ideas can be commercialized and policy freely. \nThis study analyzed the participants' perception of importance and current satisfaction of the contest to identify the problems of the public participation idea contest process and to find ways to improve the process by prioritizing the needs, and to this end, we conducted a response sample t-test, Borich demand, and The Focus for Focus model. \nThe findings are as follows. Among the step-by-step processes, the importance was significantly higher than that of satisfaction in all areas except for the promotion cooperation of ministries, similarity of ideas, and association with tasks.","PeriodicalId":270872,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Career, Entrepreneurship and Business Association","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Career, Entrepreneurship and Business Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48206/kceba.2022.6.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As we entered the VUCA era, problems became more diverse and complex, and it became difficult for governments and companies to solve problems with only a small number of ideas in the organization. Accordingly, the importance of public participation using cooperative governance and collective intelligence is increasing. The government has made public participation a key value of "government innovation" by announcing the "comprehensive government innovation promotion plan," and is expanding public participation opportunities by running programs to support public creative activities so that public ideas can be commercialized and policy freely. This study analyzed the participants' perception of importance and current satisfaction of the contest to identify the problems of the public participation idea contest process and to find ways to improve the process by prioritizing the needs, and to this end, we conducted a response sample t-test, Borich demand, and The Focus for Focus model. The findings are as follows. Among the step-by-step processes, the importance was significantly higher than that of satisfaction in all areas except for the promotion cooperation of ministries, similarity of ideas, and association with tasks.
提高公众参与有效性的政策思想体系的完善研究——基于博里奇的需求图
当我们进入VUCA时代,问题变得更加多样化和复杂,政府和公司在组织中仅仅依靠少量的想法就很难解决问题。因此,利用合作治理和集体智慧的公众参与的重要性正在增加。政府通过发表“政府创新综合促进计划”,将公众参与作为“政府创新”的核心价值,并通过支持公共创新活动的项目,扩大公众参与的机会,使公众的想法可以自由地商业化和政策化。本研究分析了参与者对竞赛重要性的感知和当前的满意度,以找出公众参与创意竞赛过程中存在的问题,并通过需求优先化来寻找改进过程的方法,为此,我们进行了响应样本t检验、Borich需求和the Focus for Focus模型。研究结果如下。在分步过程中,除了促进部门合作、想法相似、与任务相关外,其他领域的重要性都明显高于满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信