Historia – płaszczyzna wpływu w relacjach rosyjsko-ukraińskich w latach 2014-2022

Walenty Baluk, Mykola Doroshko
{"title":"Historia – płaszczyzna wpływu w relacjach rosyjsko-ukraińskich w latach 2014-2022","authors":"Walenty Baluk, Mykola Doroshko","doi":"10.36874/riesw.2022.4.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The analysis of the Russian-Ukrainian relations case study shows two different models of determining contemporary historical memory. The first (Russian) consists of continuing the imperial traditions in historiography and politics of memory, focused on maintaining the superpower myths of the tsarist and Soviet empires. The second (Ukrainian) points to an attempt by researchers and the political class to escape from the influence of Russian historiography as well as to shape their own national historical narrative and policy of memory, connected with in the European tradition. Geopolitical and historical determinism are the basis of Vladimir Putin’s imperial policy, trying to imitate the founders of the tsarist (Peter I) and Soviet (Stalin) empires. The conflict of the Russian imperial historical memory with the Ukrainian one was a significant reason for the aggression of the Russian Federation towards Ukraine. The Russian Federation has chosen an aggressive model of memory policy, treating history as a tool of influence against the so-called near and far abroad.","PeriodicalId":231114,"journal":{"name":"Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36874/riesw.2022.4.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The analysis of the Russian-Ukrainian relations case study shows two different models of determining contemporary historical memory. The first (Russian) consists of continuing the imperial traditions in historiography and politics of memory, focused on maintaining the superpower myths of the tsarist and Soviet empires. The second (Ukrainian) points to an attempt by researchers and the political class to escape from the influence of Russian historiography as well as to shape their own national historical narrative and policy of memory, connected with in the European tradition. Geopolitical and historical determinism are the basis of Vladimir Putin’s imperial policy, trying to imitate the founders of the tsarist (Peter I) and Soviet (Stalin) empires. The conflict of the Russian imperial historical memory with the Ukrainian one was a significant reason for the aggression of the Russian Federation towards Ukraine. The Russian Federation has chosen an aggressive model of memory policy, treating history as a tool of influence against the so-called near and far abroad.
对俄乌关系个案研究的分析显示了两种不同的决定当代历史记忆的模式。第一个(俄罗斯)包括在历史编纂和记忆政治方面延续帝国传统,重点是维持沙皇和苏联帝国的超级大国神话。第二个(乌克兰)指出,研究人员和政治阶层试图摆脱俄罗斯史学的影响,并塑造自己的国家历史叙事和记忆政策,与欧洲传统相联系。地缘政治和历史决定论是弗拉基米尔•普京(Vladimir Putin)帝国政策的基础,他试图模仿沙皇(彼得一世)和苏联(斯大林)帝国的创始人。俄罗斯帝国历史记忆与乌克兰历史记忆的冲突是俄罗斯联邦侵略乌克兰的一个重要原因。俄罗斯联邦选择了一种咄咄逼人的记忆政策模式,将历史视为一种对所谓远近国外施加影响的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信