Beyond Anthropological Expert Witnessing: Toward an Integrated Definition of Cultural Expertise

Livia Holden
{"title":"Beyond Anthropological Expert Witnessing: Toward an Integrated Definition of Cultural Expertise","authors":"Livia Holden","doi":"10.1108/S1059-433720190000078010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter explores expert witnessing in anthropology and the raison d’etre of cultural expertise as an integrated socio-legal concept that accounts for the contribution of social sciences to the resolution of disputes and the protection of human rights. The first section of this chapter provides a short historical outline of the occurrence and reception of anthropological expertise as expert witnessing. The second section surveys the theoretical reflections on anthropologists’ engagement with law. The third section explores the potential for anthropological expertise as a broader socio-legal notion in the common law and civil law legal systems. The chapter concludes with the opportunity and raison d’etre of cultural expertise grounded on a skeptical approach to culture. It suggests that expert witnessing has been viewed mainly from a technical perspective of applied social sciences, which was necessary to set the legal framework of cultural experts’ engagement with law, but had the consequence of entrenching the impossibility of a comprehensive study of anthropological expert witnessing. While this chapter adopts a skeptical approach to culture, it also argues the advantages of an interdisciplinary approach that leads to an integrated definition of cultural expertise.","PeriodicalId":304111,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Expertise and Socio-Legal Studies","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Expertise and Socio-Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/S1059-433720190000078010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

This chapter explores expert witnessing in anthropology and the raison d’etre of cultural expertise as an integrated socio-legal concept that accounts for the contribution of social sciences to the resolution of disputes and the protection of human rights. The first section of this chapter provides a short historical outline of the occurrence and reception of anthropological expertise as expert witnessing. The second section surveys the theoretical reflections on anthropologists’ engagement with law. The third section explores the potential for anthropological expertise as a broader socio-legal notion in the common law and civil law legal systems. The chapter concludes with the opportunity and raison d’etre of cultural expertise grounded on a skeptical approach to culture. It suggests that expert witnessing has been viewed mainly from a technical perspective of applied social sciences, which was necessary to set the legal framework of cultural experts’ engagement with law, but had the consequence of entrenching the impossibility of a comprehensive study of anthropological expert witnessing. While this chapter adopts a skeptical approach to culture, it also argues the advantages of an interdisciplinary approach that leads to an integrated definition of cultural expertise.
超越人类学专家见证:走向文化专家的综合定义
本章探讨了人类学中的专家见证,以及文化专业知识作为一种综合的社会法律概念存在的理由,这种概念解释了社会科学对解决争端和保护人权的贡献。本章的第一部分简要介绍了作为专家见证的人类学专业知识的发生和接受的历史概况。第二部分考察了人类学家从事法律研究的理论反思。第三部分探讨了人类学专业知识在普通法和大陆法系法律体系中作为更广泛的社会法律概念的潜力。本章总结了基于对文化的怀疑态度的文化专业知识的机会和存在的理由。这表明,专家见证主要是从应用社会科学的技术角度来看待的,这对于建立文化专家参与法律的法律框架是必要的,但其后果是确立了对人类学专家见证进行全面研究的不可能性。虽然本章对文化采取了怀疑态度,但它也论证了跨学科方法的优势,这种方法可以导致对文化专业知识的综合定义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信