Empirical Assessment of Test-First Approach

Liang Huang, M. Holcombe
{"title":"Empirical Assessment of Test-First Approach","authors":"Liang Huang, M. Holcombe","doi":"10.1109/TAIC-PART.2006.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The test-first approach, which is based on an iterative process of \"setting up test cases, implementing the functionality, and having all test cases passed\", has been put forward for decades however knowledge on test-first approach is limited. This research abstract states the limitations that previous studies in this area have, describes a controlled experiment with undergraduate students in the context of Sheffield Software Engineering Observatory (SSEO) environment to investigate the distinction between test-first and test-last approach (traditional approach), presents research questions and hypotheses set up before the experiment from the quality and productivity perspective, and expounds methods of data collection and validation","PeriodicalId":441264,"journal":{"name":"Testing: Academic & Industrial Conference - Practice And Research Techniques (TAIC PART'06)","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Testing: Academic & Industrial Conference - Practice And Research Techniques (TAIC PART'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TAIC-PART.2006.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The test-first approach, which is based on an iterative process of "setting up test cases, implementing the functionality, and having all test cases passed", has been put forward for decades however knowledge on test-first approach is limited. This research abstract states the limitations that previous studies in this area have, describes a controlled experiment with undergraduate students in the context of Sheffield Software Engineering Observatory (SSEO) environment to investigate the distinction between test-first and test-last approach (traditional approach), presents research questions and hypotheses set up before the experiment from the quality and productivity perspective, and expounds methods of data collection and validation
测试优先方法的实证评估
基于“建立测试用例,实现功能,并通过所有测试用例”的迭代过程的测试优先方法已经提出了几十年,但是对测试优先方法的了解有限。本研究摘要阐述了该领域已有研究的局限性,描述了在谢菲尔德软件工程天文台(SSEO)环境下以本科生为对象进行的对照实验,探讨了测试先行和测试后方法(传统方法)的区别,从质量和生产力的角度提出了实验前的研究问题和假设,并阐述了数据收集和验证的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信