Natural law, human dignity and tradition of Böckenförde’s catholic political theology, from a conservative viewpoint

Ferenc Hörcher
{"title":"Natural law, human dignity and tradition of Böckenförde’s catholic political theology, from a conservative viewpoint","authors":"Ferenc Hörcher","doi":"10.32575/ppb.2021.2.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to show the connection between ideas on natural law, human dignity and tradition in the legal-political thought of Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, an influential earlier judge of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court. It starts out from the Catholic background of the legal theorist, and his close connection to Carl Schmitt, probably the most charismatic legal thinker of the age, who, however, burnt himself by his support of the Nazi regime. Böckenförde was politically closest to the Social Democrats, yet political theology remained crucial for his legal thought. His interpretation of the German Grundgesetz was founded on a very strong, universalist interpretation of the concept of human dignity, which he took as the most important, founding value in the value catalogue of the Basic Law. Although not a conservative, Böckenförde also claimed that in a specific legal sense, tradition also plays a major role in legal interpretation. He took over from the writings of his brother, the theologian Werner, the idea that tradition and reception can serve as checks on the way natural law is interpreted. All in all, as Böckenförde points out, the three concepts (natural law, human dignity and tradition) provide a strong foundation for legal and constitutional interpretation.","PeriodicalId":127083,"journal":{"name":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2021.2.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to show the connection between ideas on natural law, human dignity and tradition in the legal-political thought of Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, an influential earlier judge of Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court. It starts out from the Catholic background of the legal theorist, and his close connection to Carl Schmitt, probably the most charismatic legal thinker of the age, who, however, burnt himself by his support of the Nazi regime. Böckenförde was politically closest to the Social Democrats, yet political theology remained crucial for his legal thought. His interpretation of the German Grundgesetz was founded on a very strong, universalist interpretation of the concept of human dignity, which he took as the most important, founding value in the value catalogue of the Basic Law. Although not a conservative, Böckenförde also claimed that in a specific legal sense, tradition also plays a major role in legal interpretation. He took over from the writings of his brother, the theologian Werner, the idea that tradition and reception can serve as checks on the way natural law is interpreted. All in all, as Böckenförde points out, the three concepts (natural law, human dignity and tradition) provide a strong foundation for legal and constitutional interpretation.
从保守的观点看Böckenförde天主教政治神学的自然法、人的尊严与传统
本文旨在揭示德国联邦宪法法院早期颇有影响的法官Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde的法律政治思想中自然法思想、人的尊严思想和传统思想之间的联系。它始于这位法律理论家的天主教背景,以及他与卡尔·施密特(Carl Schmitt)的密切联系,后者可能是当时最具魅力的法律思想家,然而,后者因支持纳粹政权而自焚。Böckenförde在政治上与社会民主党最接近,但政治神学对他的法律思想仍然至关重要。他对德国《基本法》的解释是建立在对人类尊严概念的一种非常强烈的、普遍主义的解释之上的,他认为这是《基本法》价值目录中最重要的、最基本的价值。虽然不是保守派,Böckenförde也声称,在特定的法律意义上,传统在法律解释中也起着主要作用。他从他的兄弟,神学家维尔纳的著作中继承了传统和接受可以作为对自然法则解释方式的检查的观点。总而言之,正如Böckenförde所指出的,这三个概念(自然法、人的尊严和传统)为法律和宪法解释提供了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信