Evaluation of asthma with special reference to asthma evaluation score

N. K. Makwana
{"title":"Evaluation of asthma with special reference to asthma evaluation score","authors":"N. K. Makwana","doi":"10.33545/26643685.2019.v2.i2b.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Assess severity with different asthma scores, correlate PEFR & Spo2 with clinical scores. Methods: Prospective study done at tertiary hospital including 100 asthma children. Clinical asthma evaluation score (D.W.), Pulmonary index (Becker) & Pulmonary score (Sharon smith) with Spo2 &PEFR measured initially & 1 hour after treatment. Acute severe asthma on presentation & no significant improvement after 1 hour of Rx were admitted. Results: In W.D, 1(100%), 8(100%) & 54/91(59.3%) with score>7, 6-7& 0-5 respectively admitted. In P.I.16 (100%), 45/63(71.42%) & 2/21(9.5%) with score >6, 4-6& 0-3respectively admitted. In P.S. 11(100%), 49/65(75.38%) & 3/24(12.5%) with score>6, 4-6&0-3 respectively admitted. No patients with PEFR>= 80% admitted. All patients with SPO2<=90% admitted. Coefficient of correlation between PEFR &score W.D., P.I. & P.S. IS -0.65, -0.64 & -0.66 respectively. Coeff. of correlation between SPO2 & score W.D., P.I. & P.S. is 0.68, 0.67 & 0.62 respectively. Conclusion: PEFR have significant negative correlation with scores. But pulmonary score is easy to perform & doesn’t require laboratory assistance. SPO2 show significant negative correlation with scores.","PeriodicalId":144032,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Paediatrics and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33545/26643685.2019.v2.i2b.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Assess severity with different asthma scores, correlate PEFR & Spo2 with clinical scores. Methods: Prospective study done at tertiary hospital including 100 asthma children. Clinical asthma evaluation score (D.W.), Pulmonary index (Becker) & Pulmonary score (Sharon smith) with Spo2 &PEFR measured initially & 1 hour after treatment. Acute severe asthma on presentation & no significant improvement after 1 hour of Rx were admitted. Results: In W.D, 1(100%), 8(100%) & 54/91(59.3%) with score>7, 6-7& 0-5 respectively admitted. In P.I.16 (100%), 45/63(71.42%) & 2/21(9.5%) with score >6, 4-6& 0-3respectively admitted. In P.S. 11(100%), 49/65(75.38%) & 3/24(12.5%) with score>6, 4-6&0-3 respectively admitted. No patients with PEFR>= 80% admitted. All patients with SPO2<=90% admitted. Coefficient of correlation between PEFR &score W.D., P.I. & P.S. IS -0.65, -0.64 & -0.66 respectively. Coeff. of correlation between SPO2 & score W.D., P.I. & P.S. is 0.68, 0.67 & 0.62 respectively. Conclusion: PEFR have significant negative correlation with scores. But pulmonary score is easy to perform & doesn’t require laboratory assistance. SPO2 show significant negative correlation with scores.
哮喘评价特别参照哮喘评价评分
目的:评价不同哮喘评分的严重程度,PEFR和Spo2与临床评分的相关性。方法:在三级医院对100例哮喘患儿进行前瞻性研究。临床哮喘评估评分(D.W.),肺指数(Becker)和肺评分(Sharon smith), Spo2和pefr在治疗前和治疗后1小时测量。入院时为急性严重哮喘,服药1小时后无明显改善。结果:评分>7、6-7、0-5的患者分别为1例(100%)、8例(100%)、54/91例(59.3%)。在P.I.16(100%), 45/63(71.42%)和2/21(9.5%),分别为得分>6,4-6和0-3。在P.S. 11(100%), 49/65(75.38%)和3/24(12.5%)分数>6,4-6和0-3分别被录取。PEFR> 80%的患者均未入院。SPO2<=90%的患者全部入院。PEFR与评分w.d.、P.I.、P.S.的相关系数分别为-0.65、-0.64、-0.66。多项式系数。SPO2与评分W.D、P.I.、P.S.的相关系数分别为0.68、0.67、0.62。结论:PEFR与评分呈显著负相关。但肺评分容易操作且不需要实验室协助。SPO2与得分呈显著负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信