{"title":"Margin Squeeze in a Regulatory Environment: An Application to Differentiated Product Markets","authors":"Marc Petulowa, Claudia Saavedra","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2236258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the effects of banning pricing policies that lead to margin squeezes when the upstream good is imperfectly regulated. The analysis relies on a modelling with a vertically integrated upstream monopolist that faces competition by an unintegrated downstream competitor. It shows that for differentiated goods in the downstream market, a margin squeeze can be observed as the competitive outcome rather than exclusionary conduct. If upstream market regulation is non-constraining, a margin squeeze ban induces the vertically integrated firm to increase its own downstream price (this is, a price umbrella), but also to review its upstream pricing behavior and reduce the upstream price charged to the retail competitor. This \"decreasing rivals' costs effect\" (DRC-effect) allows the integrated firm to maximise its profits given the constraint on the downstream price, and allows the downstream competitor to set a lower retail price. However, when constraining upstream regulation and a ban are implemented jointly, the DRC-effect vanishes and downstream prices may to rise, leading to a decrease of consumer surplus. This analysis tends to back up the American way of handling margin squeezes in a regulated environment.","PeriodicalId":138725,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Markets & Investment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2236258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
This paper analyses the effects of banning pricing policies that lead to margin squeezes when the upstream good is imperfectly regulated. The analysis relies on a modelling with a vertically integrated upstream monopolist that faces competition by an unintegrated downstream competitor. It shows that for differentiated goods in the downstream market, a margin squeeze can be observed as the competitive outcome rather than exclusionary conduct. If upstream market regulation is non-constraining, a margin squeeze ban induces the vertically integrated firm to increase its own downstream price (this is, a price umbrella), but also to review its upstream pricing behavior and reduce the upstream price charged to the retail competitor. This "decreasing rivals' costs effect" (DRC-effect) allows the integrated firm to maximise its profits given the constraint on the downstream price, and allows the downstream competitor to set a lower retail price. However, when constraining upstream regulation and a ban are implemented jointly, the DRC-effect vanishes and downstream prices may to rise, leading to a decrease of consumer surplus. This analysis tends to back up the American way of handling margin squeezes in a regulated environment.