HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS' SAFETY MEASURES AND AWARENESS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HOSPITAL LABORATORIES IN BURAYDAH, AL QASSIM

Shuaa Z Alshammari, U. Irfan
{"title":"HAZARDOUS CHEMICALS' SAFETY MEASURES AND AWARENESS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HOSPITAL LABORATORIES IN BURAYDAH, AL QASSIM","authors":"Shuaa Z Alshammari, U. Irfan","doi":"10.20319/LIJHLS.2018.43.102117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Medical laboratories in general operate with various hazardous chemicals. The storage, usage and knowledge about the hazardous chemicals are important aspects of safety measures employed in Medical Laboratories. This comparative study explores the differences in safety measures and knowledge of chemical safety among laboratory employees in Public (PBL) and Private (PRL) Hospital medical laboratories. This cross-sectional study was conducted in randomly selected Public and Private Hospital laboratories in Buraydah, Al Qassim, in 2013. The study was designed to: estimate the proportion and types of the hazardous chemicals used in the laboratories with a chemicals list; to assess safety measures currently being practiced with a standard chemical safety measures checklist; and to assess laboratory employee awareness on chemical safety with an interview schedule. Public Laboratories showed better results as compared to the Private Laboratories, in that their employees were more disciplined in wearing Personal Protection Equipment, and the laboratory was active in managing chemical accidents and its consequences. Whereas the Private Laboratories had better results on four aspects, namely: better storage and handling of hazardous chemicals; neutralizing hazardous chemicals; better precautions established for hazardous chemical use; and better assessment of chemical toxicity, as compared to the Public Laboratories. There were subtle differences between the Public and Private medical laboratories on chemical safety measures. The differences recorded were mainly in storage and handling of hazardous chemicals; the proportion and types of hazardous chemicals used; employee discipline on chemical safety measures; assessment of chemical toxicity; and in managing chemical accidents in the laboratories. Article DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2018.43.102117 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.","PeriodicalId":260489,"journal":{"name":"LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LIFE: International Journal of Health and Life-Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20319/LIJHLS.2018.43.102117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Medical laboratories in general operate with various hazardous chemicals. The storage, usage and knowledge about the hazardous chemicals are important aspects of safety measures employed in Medical Laboratories. This comparative study explores the differences in safety measures and knowledge of chemical safety among laboratory employees in Public (PBL) and Private (PRL) Hospital medical laboratories. This cross-sectional study was conducted in randomly selected Public and Private Hospital laboratories in Buraydah, Al Qassim, in 2013. The study was designed to: estimate the proportion and types of the hazardous chemicals used in the laboratories with a chemicals list; to assess safety measures currently being practiced with a standard chemical safety measures checklist; and to assess laboratory employee awareness on chemical safety with an interview schedule. Public Laboratories showed better results as compared to the Private Laboratories, in that their employees were more disciplined in wearing Personal Protection Equipment, and the laboratory was active in managing chemical accidents and its consequences. Whereas the Private Laboratories had better results on four aspects, namely: better storage and handling of hazardous chemicals; neutralizing hazardous chemicals; better precautions established for hazardous chemical use; and better assessment of chemical toxicity, as compared to the Public Laboratories. There were subtle differences between the Public and Private medical laboratories on chemical safety measures. The differences recorded were mainly in storage and handling of hazardous chemicals; the proportion and types of hazardous chemicals used; employee discipline on chemical safety measures; assessment of chemical toxicity; and in managing chemical accidents in the laboratories. Article DOI:  https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2018.43.102117 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-commercial 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, PO Box 1866, Mountain View, CA 94042, USA.
卡西姆省布赖达省公立和私立医院实验室的危险化学品安全措施和认识
医学实验室通常使用各种危险化学品。危险化学品的储存、使用和知识是医学实验室安全措施的重要方面。本比较研究探讨公立(PBL)和私立(PRL)医院医学实验室实验室员工在安全措施和化学安全知识方面的差异。这项横断面研究于2013年在卡西姆Buraydah市随机选择的公立和私立医院实验室进行。该研究的目的是:估计有化学品清单的实验室使用的危险化学品的比例和类型;使用标准化学品安全措施清单评估目前正在实施的安全措施;并通过面试时间表评估实验室员工对化学品安全的认识。公营实验室的表现较私营实验室好,因为它们的雇员在穿戴个人防护装备方面更有纪律,而且实验室积极处理化学事故及其后果。鉴于私营化验室在四个方面取得了较好的结果,即:更好地储存和处理危险化学品;中和危险化学品;为危险化学品的使用制定了更好的预防措施;与公共实验室相比,可以更好地评估化学毒性。公立和私立医疗实验室在化学品安全措施方面存在细微差异。记录的差异主要是在危险化学品的储存和处理方面;使用危险化学品的比例和种类;员工对化学品安全措施的纪律;化学品毒性评价;以及处理实验室的化学事故。文章DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.20319/lijhls.2018.43.102117本作品遵循知识共享署名-非商业4.0国际许可协议。要查看本许可协议的副本,请访问http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/或致函美国山景城CA 94042邮政信箱1866号创用cc。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信