KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN LISAN APABILA TERJADI WANPRESTASI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1176/PDT.G/2020/PN SBY)

Antonia Junianti Hendrieta Kelanit
{"title":"KEKUATAN HUKUM PERJANJIAN LISAN APABILA TERJADI WANPRESTASI (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 1176/PDT.G/2020/PN SBY)","authors":"Antonia Junianti Hendrieta Kelanit","doi":"10.53363/bureau.v2i3.106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research focuses on the power of oral agreements in the event of default. The purpose of this study is to find out more about the legal strength of oral agreements by racing against the judge's consideration of the act of default in the Surabaya District Court Decision Number 1176/Pdt.G/2020/PN. Sling. The agreement binds the parties therein to carry out what has been mutually agreed upon in the agreement so as to have legal consequences for the parties involved in it. In Indonesia, the legal provisions of the agreement are regulated in the Civil Code contained in Book III on Perikatan. It is not clearly determined whether the agreement should be formed in a script (written) but rather frees the party concerned to determine for himself the form of the agreement he wants as long as it does not conflict with the applicable provisions. However, of course, there are various agreements that require it to be made in written form for clearer legal certainty, especially in terms of proof in the event of a Default or Default so that the legal force is more guaranteed. Oral agreements made are actually weak if they are not supported by strong evidence such as in written agreements","PeriodicalId":345865,"journal":{"name":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53363/bureau.v2i3.106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research focuses on the power of oral agreements in the event of default. The purpose of this study is to find out more about the legal strength of oral agreements by racing against the judge's consideration of the act of default in the Surabaya District Court Decision Number 1176/Pdt.G/2020/PN. Sling. The agreement binds the parties therein to carry out what has been mutually agreed upon in the agreement so as to have legal consequences for the parties involved in it. In Indonesia, the legal provisions of the agreement are regulated in the Civil Code contained in Book III on Perikatan. It is not clearly determined whether the agreement should be formed in a script (written) but rather frees the party concerned to determine for himself the form of the agreement he wants as long as it does not conflict with the applicable provisions. However, of course, there are various agreements that require it to be made in written form for clearer legal certainty, especially in terms of proof in the event of a Default or Default so that the legal force is more guaranteed. Oral agreements made are actually weak if they are not supported by strong evidence such as in written agreements
口头契约法的力量,当需要成就时(裁决编号1176/PDT的研究)。G PN - 2020年间比)
本研究的重点是在违约情况下口头协议的力量。本研究的目的是通过对比泗水地方法院第1176/Pdt.G/2020/PN号判决中法官对违约行为的考虑,更多地了解口头协议的法律效力。吊索。本协议约束双方履行本协议所约定的事项,并对协议各方产生法律后果。在印度尼西亚,该协定的法律条款在《民法典》(载于关于Perikatan的第三卷)中加以规定。没有明确规定协议是否应当采用书面形式,而是允许当事人在不违反适用规定的情况下自行决定协议的形式。但是,当然,也有各种协议要求以书面形式订立,以获得更明确的法律确定性,特别是在发生违约或违约时的证明方面,使法律效力得到更大的保证。如果没有书面协议等强有力的证据支持,口头协议实际上是软弱无力的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信