The First Element of Command Responsibility - The Existence of the Relationship of Superior - Subordinate In the International Customary Law

Jasmina Ćosić Dedović, Sedin Idrizović
{"title":"The First Element of Command Responsibility - The Existence of the Relationship of Superior - Subordinate In the International Customary Law","authors":"Jasmina Ćosić Dedović, Sedin Idrizović","doi":"10.51235/KT.2021.21.1.37","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proper understanding of the constitutive elements of the command responsibility is the key to its proper application in practice, and the relationship between superior and subordinate as well as effective control is certainly one of the more complex issues that is insufficiently elaborated in the professional public and the public at large. The constitutive elements of the superior's command responsibility have their roots in the customary international law. One of these elements, without which there is no command responsibility of the superior, is the existence of a superior-subordinate relationship, which at its core implies existence of the effective control of the superior over the subordinate. The ad hoc tribunals of the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda paid particular attention to interpretation of this element of command responsibility in their jurisprudence. The goal of the authors is to show the context in which this first element of command responsibility gained \"its place\" in the international customary law and international conventional law as well as to show how the first element has been interpreted in jurisprudence. Therefore, in the context of this first element, the paper deals with the analysis of customary international law, international agreements and individual decisions of international ad hoc tribunals.  ","PeriodicalId":375468,"journal":{"name":"Kriminalističke teme","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kriminalističke teme","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51235/KT.2021.21.1.37","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proper understanding of the constitutive elements of the command responsibility is the key to its proper application in practice, and the relationship between superior and subordinate as well as effective control is certainly one of the more complex issues that is insufficiently elaborated in the professional public and the public at large. The constitutive elements of the superior's command responsibility have their roots in the customary international law. One of these elements, without which there is no command responsibility of the superior, is the existence of a superior-subordinate relationship, which at its core implies existence of the effective control of the superior over the subordinate. The ad hoc tribunals of the former Yugoslavia and Rwanda paid particular attention to interpretation of this element of command responsibility in their jurisprudence. The goal of the authors is to show the context in which this first element of command responsibility gained "its place" in the international customary law and international conventional law as well as to show how the first element has been interpreted in jurisprudence. Therefore, in the context of this first element, the paper deals with the analysis of customary international law, international agreements and individual decisions of international ad hoc tribunals.  
指挥责任的第一要件——国际习惯法中上下级关系的存在
正确理解指挥责任的构成要素是在实践中正确运用指挥责任的关键,而上下级关系以及有效控制无疑是专业公众和广大公众没有充分阐述的较为复杂的问题之一。上级指挥责任的构成要素植根于习惯国际法。其中一个要素是上下级关系的存在,没有上下级关系就没有上级的指挥责任,上下级关系的核心是上级对下级的有效控制。前南斯拉夫和卢旺达的特设法庭在其判例中特别注意对这一指挥责任因素的解释。作者的目的是要说明命令责任的第一个要素在国际习惯法和国际公约法中获得“地位”的背景,并说明第一个要素在法理学中是如何解释的。因此,在第一个要素的范围内,本文将分析习惯国际法、国际协定和国际特设法庭的个别决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信