Volumetric Evaluation of 3D Models Generated by Different Surface Treatment Protocols

William S. Carvalho, V. D. S. M. Almeida, L. Provedel, A. Maciel, V. Sarmento
{"title":"Volumetric Evaluation of 3D Models Generated by Different Surface Treatment Protocols","authors":"William S. Carvalho, V. D. S. M. Almeida, L. Provedel, A. Maciel, V. Sarmento","doi":"10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.5.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThe objective of this study was to compare the volume of three-dimensional (3D) models generated by different scanners and computational modeling protocols. Eight dry mandibles were scanned by five different computed tomography (CT) scanners and by a 3D-scanner. Three-dimensional models were generated, received different surface treatment processes, and the final volume of the 3D models was compared. The results show that there was no significant difference among the volume of the 3D models generated by the different CT scanners and surface treatment techniques, however, the model volume generated by the 3D-scanner show the highest volume. It can be concluded that the different combinations of surface treatment protocols did not determine differences in the model volume generated by different CT and CBCT scanners and that the 3D-scanner determined the highest volume models. \n","PeriodicalId":197045,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","volume":"78 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Dental and Oral Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24018/ejdent.2022.3.5.229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the volume of three-dimensional (3D) models generated by different scanners and computational modeling protocols. Eight dry mandibles were scanned by five different computed tomography (CT) scanners and by a 3D-scanner. Three-dimensional models were generated, received different surface treatment processes, and the final volume of the 3D models was compared. The results show that there was no significant difference among the volume of the 3D models generated by the different CT scanners and surface treatment techniques, however, the model volume generated by the 3D-scanner show the highest volume. It can be concluded that the different combinations of surface treatment protocols did not determine differences in the model volume generated by different CT and CBCT scanners and that the 3D-scanner determined the highest volume models.
不同表面处理方案生成的三维模型的体积评估
本研究的目的是比较不同扫描仪和计算建模协议生成的三维(3D)模型的体积。通过五种不同的计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪和3d扫描仪扫描了8个干燥的下颌骨。生成三维模型,接受不同的表面处理工艺,并对三维模型的最终体积进行比较。结果表明,不同CT扫描仪和表面处理技术生成的三维模型体积没有显著差异,但3D扫描仪生成的模型体积最大。可以得出结论,不同的表面处理方案组合并没有决定不同CT和CBCT扫描仪生成的模型体积的差异,3d扫描仪确定了最大体积的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信