Comparison Study of Collision between Car and Different Two-Wheelers Based on PC-Crash Simulation

X. Wan, Yu Liu, Wenrui Gao, W. Xu, Qingjiang Zhao, Zhonghao Bai
{"title":"Comparison Study of Collision between Car and Different Two-Wheelers Based on PC-Crash Simulation","authors":"X. Wan, Yu Liu, Wenrui Gao, W. Xu, Qingjiang Zhao, Zhonghao Bai","doi":"10.1109/ICMTMA50254.2020.00222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there were some regulation and consumer test protocol for pedestrian protection, however, they did not consider the protection for other VRU such as bicyclist, E-bicyclist, and motorcyclist. This paper is aimed to study different dynamic response and injury patterns after collision between three kinds of two-wheelers and cars. This study is carried out by utilizing the PC-Crash software to design 54 sets of collision simulations between cars and three kinds of two-wheeler according to the realistic and frequent traffic accidents. Then compare the riders' dynamic response and injury index, such as HIC, femur and lower leg force. The results show that different kinds of the two wheelers have considerable difference when in the same impact patterns. The injury difference is caused by the construction of different two-wheelers, such as the different mass and seat height causing the various of posture and contact patterns on riders after the impact occurs. The results can provide useful information for the design both vehicle and two-wheeler to mitigate the serious injury of riders.","PeriodicalId":333866,"journal":{"name":"2020 12th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 12th International Conference on Measuring Technology and Mechatronics Automation (ICMTMA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMTMA50254.2020.00222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although there were some regulation and consumer test protocol for pedestrian protection, however, they did not consider the protection for other VRU such as bicyclist, E-bicyclist, and motorcyclist. This paper is aimed to study different dynamic response and injury patterns after collision between three kinds of two-wheelers and cars. This study is carried out by utilizing the PC-Crash software to design 54 sets of collision simulations between cars and three kinds of two-wheeler according to the realistic and frequent traffic accidents. Then compare the riders' dynamic response and injury index, such as HIC, femur and lower leg force. The results show that different kinds of the two wheelers have considerable difference when in the same impact patterns. The injury difference is caused by the construction of different two-wheelers, such as the different mass and seat height causing the various of posture and contact patterns on riders after the impact occurs. The results can provide useful information for the design both vehicle and two-wheeler to mitigate the serious injury of riders.
基于pc碰撞仿真的汽车与不同类型两轮车碰撞比较研究
虽然有一些关于行人保护的法规和消费者测试协议,但没有考虑到对其他VRU的保护,如自行车,电动自行车和摩托车手。本文旨在研究三种两轮车与汽车碰撞后不同的动力响应和损伤模式。本研究利用PC-Crash软件,针对现实频发的交通事故,设计了54套汽车与三种两轮车的碰撞仿真。然后比较骑手的动态反应和损伤指数,如HIC、股骨和小腿力。结果表明,在相同的碰撞模式下,不同类型的两轮具有较大的差异。不同的两轮车的结构造成了伤害的差异,例如不同的质量和座位高度导致骑手在碰撞后的姿势和接触方式不同。研究结果可为车辆和两轮车的设计提供参考,以减轻骑手的严重伤害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信